My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/07/20 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
2005/07/20 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 3:44:07 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 4:06:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
7/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 20,2005 <br /> Council Member Olson questioned whether there are other B.2 lots on <br /> Terrace Drive. <br /> Allan Gillen,Planning Director,stated that Safeway,which is a block or so <br /> north,is zoned B-2. <br /> Council Member Olson questioned what would happen if the City decided <br /> not to change either the Comprehensive Plan designation or the zoning? <br /> Allan Differ stated the Growth Management Act requires that the City's <br /> Zoning and Comprehensive Plans are consistent and that there are <br /> consequences for being out of compliance. <br /> Council Member Olson questioned whether there would be consequences <br /> of actions by the property owner lithe area were down zoned. <br /> Jim Iles,City Attorney,stated that the area could be down zoned as long <br /> as the owners are allowed reasonable use of their property. <br /> Council Member Nielsen questioned whether the law prohibits a lot from <br /> bearing two different zoning designations. <br /> Allan Giffen stated that the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code <br /> • <br /> suggest that split zoning is nota good practice. <br /> Council Member Krell questioned whether the two lots could have <br /> different Comprehensive Plan designations. <br /> Allan Offen stated that they could. <br /> Council Member Stonecipher questioned whether changing the R.1 to 5.2 <br /> would seta precedent for property owners to the north. <br /> Allan stated that it would only be possible If the property owners were to <br /> combine so that the application of a commercial land use designation to <br /> properties north of the Legowik property would be combined with the <br /> ownerships to the south so there was a single integrated development. <br /> 234 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.