Laserfiche WebLink
The variance criteria set forth in this section of the chapter are based on the general principle of zoning law that <br /> variances pertain to a piece of property and are not personal in nature.A variance may be granted for a parcel of <br /> property with physical characteristics so unusual that complying with the requirements of this chapter would <br /> create an exceptional hardship to the applicant or the surrounding property owners.The characteristics must be <br /> unique to the property and not be shared by adjacent parcels.The unique characteristic must pertain to the land <br /> itself, not to the structure, its inhabitants,or the property owners. <br /> It is the duty of the city of Everett to help protect its citizens from flooding.This need is so compelling and the <br /> implications of the cost of insuring a structure built below the Base Flood Elevation are so serious that variances <br /> from the flood elevation or from other requirements in this chapter are quite rare.The long-term goal of <br /> preventing and reducing flood loss and damage can only be met if variances are strictly limited.Therefore,the <br /> variance guidelines provided in this chapter are more detailed and contain multiple provisions that must be met <br /> before a variance can be properly granted.The criteria are designed to screen out those situations in which <br /> alternatives other than a variance are more appropriate. <br /> A. Requirements for Variances <br /> 1. Variances shall only be issued:Upon a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in <br /> increased flood heights,additional threats to public safety,extraordinary public expense, create <br /> nuisances,cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances; <br /> 2. For the repair, rehabilitation,or restoration of historic structures upon a determination that the proposed <br /> repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure and <br /> the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure; <br /> 3. Upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary,considering the flood hazard,to afford <br /> relief; <br /> 4. Upon a showing of good and sufficient cause; <br /> 5. Upon a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the <br /> applicant; <br /> 6. Upon a showing that the use cannot perform its intended purpose unless it is located or carried out in <br /> close proximity to water.This includes only facilities defined in Section 19.30.400 in the definition of <br /> "Functionally Dependent Use." <br /> 7. Variances shall not be issued within any floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood <br /> discharge would result. <br /> 8. Generally,variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a <br /> lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures <br /> constructed below the BFE, provided the procedures of Sections 19.30.080 and 19.30.090 have been fully <br /> considered.As the lot size increases beyond one-half acre,the technical justification required for issuing <br /> the variance increases. <br /> B. Variance Criteria <br /> In considering variance applications,the city of Everett shall consider all technical evaluations,all relevant factors, <br /> all standards specified in other sections of this chapter, and: <br /> 1. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; <br /> 2. The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; <br /> 3. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage <br /> on the individual owner; <br /> 4. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community; <br /> 5. The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location,where applicable; <br /> 6. The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use,which are not subject to flooding or erosion <br /> damage; <br /> 7. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; <br /> 17 <br />