Laserfiche WebLink
• Workshop with City to decide which receiving water is to be analyzed for basins with more than one <br />receiving water. <br />• Workshop with City to review the draft methodology on the "pilot" basin. <br />• Update narrative in basin plans to state whether TSS, nutrients, metals and fecal coliform are pollutants <br />of concern. <br />• Update section titled Analysis of Stream Health Based on Data and Pollutant Sources where applicable <br />with existing and proposed zoning graphs (e.g. pie chart or stacked bar chart), and a narrative describing <br />untreated area in the basin based on extent of treatment provided by existing BMPs. <br />• Add section to provide a narrative identifying whether stormwater management techniques such as <br />structural retrofits, enhanced stormwater management actions and non-stormwater management actions <br />may be used to address pollutants of concern <br />• Add section about development pressures in the basin. <br />• Add an Environmental Justice section to each basin plan, populated with USEPA's EJ Screen analysis <br />and narrative. <br />Everett <br />• Update land cover figure for each basin plan. <br />• Provide working development pressures map per watershed <br />• Update Waterbody Monitoring Data —Water Quality Data section for each basin plan. <br />• Provide map for chapter 2 in each watershed plan showing overburdened communities. <br />230 Assess Stormwater Management Influence <br />This task corresponds to Steps 3 on page 7 of the SMAP Guidance. The purpose of this task is to provide the <br />rationale for sorting the receiving waters according to their relative expected benefit from SMAP This task will <br />assess stormwater influences on stream hydrology and stream pollutants as follows: <br />1. Stormwater Management Influence on Stream Hydrology. Otak will develop a methodology for rating <br />influence on hydrology using the following elements: <br />a. Flow -control exempt receiving waters from the 2017 SWCP <br />b. Classifications of streams, if available from the 2017 SWCP or from updated information from WDFW <br />or City Planning. <br />c. If receiving waters primarily influenced by groundwater flows if available from the 2017 SWCP. <br />d. The impervious area in the basin and/or fraction of MS4 discharging to the receiving water. <br />2. Stormwater Management Influence on Water Quality. Otak will develop a methodology for rating influence <br />on hydrology using the following elements: <br />a. Monitoring data analysis completed in Task 220 <br />i. Example: The City's MS4 will be considered to have a high influence on receiving waters where <br />TSS and/or metals exceed the water quality standard. <br />b. Fraction of pollutant generating surfaces with limited existing treatment calculated based on zoning <br />and an approximation of area treated using BMPs. Any areas that are to be up -zoned will be <br />assumed to be treated as they will have to meet regulatory requirements for water quality. <br />i. Example: If 25 percent or more of the basin is believed to be covered in either commercial - <br />industrial surfaces, or high density residential land uses without treatment pollutant -generating <br />surfaces will be considered to have a high influence on pollutant loads in the stream. <br />c. Presence of City owned roads with ADT> 7,500 with limited existing treatment <br />d. Point sources (commercial and industrial areas) <br />e. Fraction of Everett's MS4 in relation to the entire basin <br />3 List of basins where the City's MS4 has a low influence on hydrology and water quality will not be <br />considered further in the prioritization process. <br />Receiving Waters Assessment and Update of Surface Water Comprehensive Plan <br />Scope of Work <br />5 <br />Otak <br />