Laserfiche WebLink
Committee Members, Timeline and Process <br />Committee Members were appointed by Mayor Franklin. We come from a broad range of backgrounds <br />and hold a wide array of political views, which has made for lively discussions at times. Those of us who <br />participated through the entire process and have approved this report are identified on Attachment A. <br />• <br />Mayor Franklin appointed local businessman Dan Leach to serve as our Committee Chair. The <br />Committee was supported by City staff and an independent facilitator. We met approximately twice a <br />month starting in late June 2020; each of our eight meetings lasted about an hour and a half. Due to the <br />COVID-19 pandemic, all our meetings were held remotely via Microsoft Teams. We added one <br />additional meeting to the original seven planned in order to complete our work. Our final meeting was <br />held on November 5. <br />All our meeting agendas, meeting summaries and meeting materials were posted online on the City's <br />website. Staff kept a log of any unanswered questions that arose during meetings and ensured we were <br />later provided with a written response to all such questions. <br />Our first several meetings were dedicated to learning about the City's General Government budget <br />structure and challenges. None of the Committee Members are public finance experts, so this was an <br />important foundation for us. Our last few meetings were focused on developing findings and <br />recommendations. Both Mayor Franklin and Councilmember Scott Murphy (Chair of the Council's <br />Budget and Finance Committee) made helpful introductory remarks at our first meeting. <br />Major topics we reviewed over the course of this process are outlined below: <br />• We began by learning about the City's General Government funds: what they pay for, where <br />their revenues come from, and the ongoing gap between General Government revenues and <br />expenditures that the City must, by law, close each year in some manner. <br />• We reviewed the steps that the City has taken in the last twenty years to close the General <br />Government deficit and looked at the projected gap between revenues and expenditures <br />through 2027. <br />• We looked at the results of a benchmarking study comparing Everett to peer cities —what <br />services are offered by other cities, their demographics and comparative revenue strategies. <br />We also heard what some of these cities are planning to do in response to their current financial <br />challenges —Everett is not alone in facing difficult times. <br />• We reviewed detailed proposals by each General Government department of how they would <br />implement a hypothetical 15% expenditure reduction if needed, and we had the opportunity to <br />ask questions of the police chief and fire chief as well as other department heads about these <br />hypothetical cuts. These presentations illustrated the extent of cuts made to date, and <br />emphasized that further significant cuts potentially mean eliminating staff positions —and <br />accompanying reduction in the service levels supported by those staff— assuming status quo <br />conditions with existing salary and benefit plans. <br />• Staff reviewed with us the ideas they presented to the Mayor and City Council at the beginning <br />of 2020 for closing the ongoing gap between General Government revenues and expenditure. <br />These ideas generally can be sorted into three categories: <br />(1) Making further service cuts <br />(2) Shifting some city functions to new taxing districts; and <br />2 <br />