Laserfiche WebLink
determine whether the City will be an attractive location for existing and new businesses to operate. <br />The City's role is to facilitate the planning, services and infrastructure that will ensure this. <br />We have a long way to go before Everett is a vibrant regional center. Progress towards that will take <br />time. How the City responds to the current financial crisis will determine the pace of that progress. If <br />Everett can become a very attractive place for new businesses to locate, for all types of residential <br />development, with retail and other services that makes us a destination for visitors —this in turn will <br />generate more robust revenues for the General Government. in the immediate future, however, the <br />General Government situation is critical: will the City's actions in the next two years involve dramatic <br />service level cuts, or can we buy time to implement the larger options that can right the ship? This is the <br />challenge before City leaders. <br />• Is the City fiscally sustainable? <br />By any manner in which the Committee defines this term, the answer is a resounding "no." The City has <br />for at least a decade now sought to balance its General Government budget through what some have <br />called "death by a thousand cuts.' COVID has amplified this, leading to many programmatic reductions <br />and outright closures of programs and facilities. Even before the news that Boeing will be closing the <br />local 787 assembly line, there was no cushion in the City's finances. <br />The structural gap between revenues and costs is real, and worsening. The current General Government <br />budget forecast for 2022-2027 indicates that the City will need to close increasingly larger gaps. As <br />discussed above, City General Government revenues are projected to grow at 2% per year over the next <br />six years, while growth in the cost of current General Government programs is projected to grow at an <br />annual average of 4.5% per year.' By no stretch of the imagination is this sustainable. <br />To put the current situation in somewhat daunting perspective, the City could close the entire parks <br />department and barely begin to plug the multiple year funding gap: parks spending proposed for 2021 is <br />$6 6 million, the General Government budget deficit forecast grows from an estimated $14M in 2022 to <br />just over $30M in 2027. <br />To its credit the City has implemented a number of important efficiencies over the last decade — <br />including actions to control the cost of employee benefits at the margins. The City has implemented <br />both cuts and new revenues. However, despite these actions the City's budget has reached a crisis <br />point. Without dramatic change in the revenue and expenditure picture, it will be years before recently <br />cut programs and services can be restored. In our view it simply is not possible nor prudent to kick the <br />can down the road and hope economic recovery addresses the situation. It will require bold action and <br />shared pain to overcome this challenge. <br />• Has the City done a thorough/good job in the last several years to address its financial <br />challenges' <br />On this question, we give the City a mixed review. The City has done a tremendous amount in the last <br />decade to address the General Government structural deficit: as noted above, over $104 million cuts or <br />Deferral of contribution to Law Enforcement and Fire Fighter (LEOFF) pensions and reserve funds in order to help <br />balance the 2021 budget shift this expenditure growth rate up from 3 5 % per year to 4.5%. <br />12 <br />