My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020/12/16 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2020
>
2020/12/16 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 5:55:18 PM
Creation date
12/30/2020 2:32:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
12/16/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
364
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Opportunities to help build towards fiscal sustainability: <br />We see several opportunities for the City to help stabilize the General Government budget crisis. These <br />are generally presented below in our recommendations. Larger contextual opportunities we see for <br />Everett include: <br />• An opportunity to gain from Seattle's current challenges in retaining and attracting employees <br />• An opportunity in the wake of Boeing's 787 line closure to pivot to becoming more of a green <br />infrastructure technology center <br />• A competitive advantage in having much more land capacity than most other urban centers in <br />King County <br />These points underscore our recommendation below to reframe the future vision for how Everett will <br />grow over time, particularly in our downtown, to a plan that will support stronger revenue growth for <br />the City. <br />Recommendations: Actions the Committee Endorses for Further Exploration <br />We have identified twenty-four (24) recommendations that we believe the City should further explore in <br />o rder to stabilize the City's General Government budget. Because our time together as a Committee <br />was limited and our knowledge of the situation is relatively high-level, more work is needed to frame <br />o ut the details of most of our recommendations, which in turn means it is now difficult to assess their <br />financial impact. Some of our recommendations may not pan out —they may be too complicated to <br />implement or generate too little in the way of savings or revenues. Several of our recommendations are <br />items that the Mayor and Council have been considering in the past year. <br />Our recommendations are not ranked, nor are they presented in any order of priority. As noted, we are <br />a diverse group: we did not seek to develop a short list of priorities, and it is not clear we could have <br />reached agreement on one. Rather, we concluded that the most helpful contribution we could make as <br />a Committee is to offer a longer list of recommendations that we all could support for further <br />exploration by the City. The Committee has unanimously endorsed this slate of recommended areas for <br />further exploration by the City. <br />To revisit an earlier statement: there is no silver bullet. Seeking to squeeze additional efficiencies out of <br />City operations will not yield enough savings. More cuts, alone are not the answer and could in fact be <br />very detrimental to the already challenged quality of life and business climate in Everett. Relying only on <br />n ew revenues, alone, is not realistic or fair to citizens and businesses. We firmly believe the City must <br />take action across a range of areas. We have identified seven categories of action. Since the problem is <br />long-term, we also characterize each recommendation by how long we think it may take to see positive <br />results for the General Government budget. <br />Figure 6 summarizes our approach; Table 1 presents our recommendations by category, with a brief <br />statement on the rationale for each and a note as to the time frame in which we would expect to see <br />results. Attachment B presents all the recommendations in a summary matrix. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.