My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10521 19TH AVE SE Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
19TH AVE SE
>
10521
>
Geotech Report
>
10521 19TH AVE SE Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:43:53 PM
Creation date
2/26/2021 10:48:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
19TH AVE SE
Street Number
10521
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Mixed-Use Everett <br /> 10521-19`h Ave. SE <br /> Everett, Washington <br /> March 23,2016 <br /> RN File No. 3109-001A <br /> Page 4 <br /> system and the low permeability layer. Our site explorations encountered dense to very dense <br /> glacial till at depths ranging from approximately 3 to 3.5 feet below the ground surface <br /> throughout the site. Therefore, in our opinion stormwater infiltration is not feasible for the site. <br /> Geologic Hazards <br /> Erosion Hazard: The erosion hazard criteria used for determination of affected areas includes <br /> soil type, slope gradient, vegetation cover, and groundwater conditions. The erosion sensitivity <br /> is related to vegetative cover and the specific surface soil types (group classification), which are <br /> related to the underlying geologic soil units. We reviewed the Web Soil Survey by the Natural <br /> Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to determine the erosion hazard of the on-site soils. <br /> The site surface soils were classified using the SCS classification system as Alderwood-Urban <br /> land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes (Unit 5). The corresponding geologic unit for these soils is <br /> till, which is in agreement with the soils encountered in our site explorations. The erosion <br /> hazard for the soil is listed as being moderate for the gently sloping conditions at the site. <br /> The elevator pit located within the planned structure is anticipated to extend below <br /> groundwater seepage elevations. A dewatering system should be expected, but will depend on <br /> finish elevations of the structure and elevator design. <br /> Seismic Hazard: It is our opinion based on our subsurface explorations that the Soil Profile in <br /> accordance with the 2012 international Building Code (IBC) is Site Class C with Seismic Design <br /> Category D. We used the US Geological Survey program "U.S. Seismic Design Maps Web <br /> Application." The design maps summary report for the 2012 IBC is included in this report as <br /> Appendix A. <br /> Additional seismic considerations include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground <br /> motions by soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand with a high <br /> groundwater table. The underlying dense till soils are considered to have a very low potential <br /> for liquefaction and amplification of ground motion. <br /> Site Preparation and Grading <br /> The first step of site preparation should be to strip the vegetation, topsoil, or loose soils to <br /> expose medium dense or firmer native soils in pavement and building areas. The excavated <br /> material should be removed from the site, or stockpiled for later use as landscaping fill. The <br /> resulting subgrade should be compacted to a firm, non-yielding condition. Areas observed to <br /> pump or yield should be repaired prior to placing hard surfaces. <br /> The on-site glacial till likely to be exposed during construction is considered highly moisture <br /> sensitive, and the surface will disturb easily when wet. We expect these soils would be <br /> difficult, if not impossible, to compact to structural fill specifications in wet weather. We <br /> recommend that earthwork be conducted during the drier months. Additional expenses of wet <br /> weather or winter construction could include extra excavation and use of imported fill or rock <br /> spalls. During wet weather, alternative site preparation methods may be necessary. These <br /> methods may include utilizing a smooth-bucket trackhoe to complete site stripping and <br /> Robinson Noble, inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.