Laserfiche WebLink
March 10, 2021 <br /> PROPOSED ACTION ITEMS: <br /> COUNCIL BILL 2102-06 <br /> SECOND READING: <br /> AN ORDINANCE Prohibiting Certain Conduct within Designated Rights of <br /> Way <br /> Council Member Roberts expressed an interest in the establishment of some type <br /> of evaluation structure that would evaluate the effectiveness of the ordinance <br /> during the same period as the pallet shelter pilot program. <br /> City Attorney Hall stated it would be entirely the prerogative of the Council. He <br /> noted that an amendment would not be necessary, but Council could make a <br /> motion if it would like to establish a time when Administration would come back <br /> and report how it is working. <br /> • <br /> Council Member Vogeli thanked those who commented on the proposed action. <br /> In response to earlier comments about the cost of cleanup in the area, she asked <br /> if steps could be taken before the pilot program is implemented that would be <br /> more cost effective such as installing port-a-potties and dumpsters. <br /> Council Member Murphy asked if the pilot program was not continued after the <br /> first year for whatever reason, would the no-sit no-lie ordinance automatically <br /> sunset or would it continue. <br /> City Attorney Hall stated that the way that the ordinance is currently written, it <br /> would not automatically end if the pallet program ended. He added that this could <br /> be built into the ordinance with an amendment or the ordinance could be <br /> repealed by the Council at any time. <br /> Council Member Murphy asked about the City's exposure to legal action if the no- <br /> sit no-lie ordinance continued to be in effect after the pallet program had ended. <br /> • <br /> 6 <br />