Laserfiche WebLink
54. The Everett Community Planning and Economic Development Department assumed the <br />role of lead agency for review of the project's impacts as required by the State <br />Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The Director acting as SEPA Responsible Official. <br />The Applicant submitted an environmental checklist with its application materials. The <br />Applicant then met with the Planning, Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments, <br />submitted traffic and parking studies, and revised its proposal in response to City <br />feedback. After the Planning Department approved the SEPA checklist, they required an <br />additional parking study. All of the SEPA documents were circulated to other City <br />agencies for review. Upon completion of review, the Director issued a mitigated <br />determination of non -significance (MDNS), having found that any probable, significant <br />adverse environmental impacts of the project not fully addressed through compliance <br />with applicable City development regulations and policies could be effectively mitigated <br />by four mitigation measures to a point of non -significance. The four mitigation measures <br />addressed the following: 1) grading/filling not to affect off -site property; 2) compliance <br />with transportation mitigation requirements per EMC 18.40; 3) recording of a covenant <br />(sample attached to MDNS) that governs the number of vehicles owned and parked on - <br />site by building tenants; and 4) provision of 53 parking spaces on -site, 43 for residents <br />and 10 for the proposed retail space, and recording of an additional covenant in the event <br />that any of the required parking is proposed to be provided off -site. Exhibit C-1; Dave <br />Tyler Testimony. <br />55. The MDNS required the covenant regarding parking restrictions to include a prohibition <br />against leasing to a tenant with a vehicle unless a parking stall can be provided. The <br />covenant must also require quarterly monitoring and reporting of tenant data including: <br />certification that tenants are primarily students or were enrolled students within the <br />previous school year; numbers of tenants broken down into domestic students, <br />international students, and non -students; numbers of tenants who own, lease, store, or use <br />a vehicle for purposes of transit to/from the property; and the number of residential <br />parking stalls the property manager has assigned. Exhibit C-1. <br />56. The number of parking stalls required for the proposed retail space was based on the off- <br />street parking provisions within the zoning code at EMC Chapter 19.34, Table 34-1. In <br />order to arrive at a number of residential parking stalls required for the project, the <br />Applicant submitted a professionally prepared parking demand memorandum (parking <br />memo) that includes trip generation estimates and parking demand data for a mix of <br />international and domestic students based on documented vehicle ownership and parking <br />utilization rates at Everett Community College. The parking memo assumed a mix of <br />50% domestic/50% international students residing in the project. Based on the ECC- <br />specific data, the parking memo projected 167 daily residential vehicle trips, including 13 <br />AM and 16 PM peak hour trips, from the project. Parking permit data (2017) from the <br />College showed international students tend to own cars at a rate of 0.02 cars per student, <br />while domestic students own cars at a rate of 0.34 vehicles per student. Based on these <br />Findings, Conclusions, and Decisions in the Everett Comm. College Appeals of <br />Koz Student Housing Administrative Decisions REV II # 17-016, PDI # 15-02, PDI # 18-02, and SEPA # 17-013 <br />Everett Hearing Examiner page 25 of 32 <br />