Laserfiche WebLink
exempt from flow control as there will be less than a 0.15 CFS increase in offsite runoff <br /> and the effective impervious are is 4,643 SF which is less than the 5,000 SF threshold <br /> requiring flow control. See Section 8D of this report for the hydraulic calculations. Water <br /> quality is also exempt as the proposed PGHS is 4,902 SF which is less than the 5,000 SF <br /> threshold to for water quality. See Section 3 for hard surface replacement, PGHS, and <br /> effective impervious totals. <br /> The total disturbed area for Basin B will be 0.61 acres. The total new hard surface <br /> quantity is 0.01 acres (200 SF) and the total replaced hard surface will be 0.07 acres (3,078 <br /> SF) of new impervious is proposed. The total effective impervious area for the Basin B is <br /> 3,280 SF Minimum requirements 1-9 apply to Basin B as the proposed improvements will <br /> exceed 50% of the existing site's value. Refer to the Flowchart for Determining <br /> Requirements for Redevelopment attached in the next page. Basin B is exempt from flow <br /> control as there will be less than a 0.15 CFS increase in offsite runoff and the effective <br /> impervious are is 3,280 SF which is less than the 5,000 SF threshold requiring flow control. <br /> See Section 8D of this report for the hydraulic calculations. Water quality is also exempt as <br /> the proposed PGHS is 596 SF which is less than the 5,000 SF threshold to for water <br /> quality. See Section 3 for hard surface replacement, PGHS, and effective impervious totals. <br /> For onsite stormwater management (MR#5) list # 2 was used for both basins per <br /> Vol 1 section 2.5.5 of the SWMMWW. Full dispersion was considered first however it was <br /> deemed infeasible due to the lack of native vegetation. Downspout full infiltration was <br /> deemed infeasible as the site lacks the necessary area to accommodate full infiltration <br /> facilities within the required setbacks. Bioretention was deemed feasible. Onsite <br /> stormwater management for roof areas will be provided by two bioretention facilities, one <br /> for each basin, per BMP T5.14B. The overflow from the bioretention will be connected to <br /> the existing drainage system onsite that drains to Evergreen Way for Basin A and South to <br /> Holly Drive for Basin B within a closed pipe system. For other new and replaced hard <br /> surfaces, full dispersion was considered infeasible due to the lack of vegetation, permeable <br /> pavement was deemed feasible and will be used. Most of the parking lot will receive a 2" <br /> Insight Engineering Co. -Stormwater Site Plan 12/20/2018 <br /> -4- <br />