My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3314 31ST DR 2021-05-17
>
Address Records
>
31ST DR
>
3314
>
3314 31ST DR 2021-05-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2021 1:59:18 PM
Creation date
5/17/2021 1:19:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
31ST DR
Street Number
3314
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Laii1DESIGM FIELD REPORT <br /> 1 of <br /> Project Name: , Everett River Front- Eclipse (3) Report: 005 <br /> GeoDesign#: ; Polygon-128-03 Date: 12/13/2016 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW 1504-055 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather:Clear, 20's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1300/1400 <br /> Distribution _ m.. <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) ; Prepared 8y: Benjamin Weinberg <br /> Attachments. 0 Site Plan(s) 0 Density Test Summary Signature: Or:— �` 7 <br /> ❑ Installation Records ❑Other Reviewed By: go <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Benjamin Weinberg, was on-site at the request of Eddy Stevens with <br /> Polygon to observe placement of fill for Building 20 and foundation subgrade for Building 1. <br /> SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Building 20-Mat Foundation Fill Observation(East 1/2): <br /> Previously, GeoDeisgn noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had placed approximately 4 inches of CSTC <br /> material as capillary break material over a 10-mil plastic sheet which was loose at the time of our site visit. Today, <br /> GeoDesign noted that the material had been compacted into a firm and unyielding mass using a standard walk-behind plate <br /> compactor. The material appeared to be suitable for support of the intended load. <br /> Building 1 -Mat Foundation Foundation Observations(South 1/2): <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor was in the process of digging the mat foundation <br /> area for the south half of Building 1. GeoDesign noted that the foundation subgrade consisted of a mixture of cement <br /> treated backfill material observed during ground improvement trench installation and a gray silty SAND(f-m)with gravel. <br /> The cement treated material encountered could be penetrated less than 1 inch using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> Generally,the gray silty SAND with gravel that was encountered outside of the ground improvement trench areas could be <br /> probed less than 1-2 inches. <br /> For an area on the south perimeter of the mat foundation area, GeoDesign noted a previously excavated test pit area which <br /> had been backfilled with material tamped into place using the bucket of an excavator(-3-4 feet wide and 10 feet long);this <br /> material could be probed 2 to 3 feet. GeoDesign recommended over-excavating 3 feet of material,stabilizing the base of <br /> the excavation with quarry spells if necessary, and backfilling the area with cement treated material compacted in lifts. <br /> Today, GeoDesign observed the removal of approximately 3 feet of material from the abovementioned area. The exposed <br /> base of the excavation consisted of firm material which could be probed less than 3 inches. The over-excavated material <br /> was backfilled with cement treated material compacted in lifts. Based on our experience with the cement-treated material <br /> on-site, the backfill material should provide adequate support for the intended load. <br /> GeoDesign noted that the exposed subgrade for the thickened portions of the mat foundation excavation were currently <br /> suitable for support of the intended structure. GeoDesign noted 3 to 4 inches of surficially loose material around the edges <br /> of the non-thickened portions of the mat foundation excavation that will require removal prior to placement of the vapor <br /> barrier and capillary break material. <br /> A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Nuclear Density <br /> Gauge Data. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents.Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section.. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.