My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3313 31ST DR 2021-05-27
>
Address Records
>
31ST DR
>
3313
>
3313 31ST DR 2021-05-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2021 8:00:21 AM
Creation date
5/17/2021 3:47:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
31ST DR
Street Number
3313
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
En ESI z FIELD REPORT <br /> 1 of 3 <br /> < Project Name: !; Everett River Front- Eclipse(3) Report: 012 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-128-03 Date: 2/14/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> P W 1504-055 <br /> 1211 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Cloudy,40's • <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) 1 Arrival/Departure: 1315/1345 <br /> Distribution. __ _. _ —_. <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) <br /> i. Paul McKee(City of Everett) g Prepared By: Joe Dapcevich <br /> Attachments: <br /> m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: <br /> Installation Records 0 Other j Reviewed By: le..r <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative,Joe Dapcevich,was on-site to observe the mat foundation subgrade for <br /> Building 3. <br /> SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Building 3-Mat Foundation Observations(Foundation Subgrade): <br /> Upon arrival, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had finished excavation for the Building 3 mat <br /> foundation area. The mat foundation area generally consisted of a light brown/gray silty SAND with gravel which could be <br /> probed less than 1/2 inch using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> Relative compaction of the mat foundation subgrade was tested using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge. In-place density <br /> tests indicated that the material had been compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a <br /> Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> GeoDesign recommends that any standing water or surficially loose and saturated material which may build up be removed <br /> from the base of the footing area prior to the placement of concrete. A summary of our observations and density tests <br /> taken today can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Nuclear Density Gauge Data. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety. This held report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206,838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.