Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> Table 1. Summary of Soil Consolidation Properties • <br /> Compression <br /> Coefficient of Max Secondary Time to End • <br /> • <br /> Soil Index OCR2 Consolidation Drainage Compression of Primary <br /> Layer Cv Path Index Consolidation 40 <br /> Ccar (feetz/day)3 (feet)° Cass (days)6 <br /> • <br /> Silt and , <br /> Organic 0.30 1.0 0.30 7.5 0.010 250 - 300 <br /> Silt <br /> 40 <br /> 1. Estimated value based on laboratory tests on similar soil at the nearby Everett Riverfront Simpson site. • <br /> 2. Estimated based on site geologic history. <br /> 3. Based on site consolidation data from laboratory testing performed by ESNW in March 2015. <br /> 4. Estimated based on data from soil borings that indicates the typical thickness of the soft to medium stiff silt and • <br /> organic silt layer is 15 feet. Assumes sand drainage layers are present above and below silt layers. <br /> 5. Estimated using published correlations for moisture content(Mesri, 1973). • <br /> 6. Time required to reach the end of primary consolidation was estimated using values obtained from site consolidation • <br /> data. Does not take into account soil surcharge. <br /> • <br /> We performed a settlement analysis for soil profiles with 10 to 20 feet of soft to medium stiff silt. A <br /> We assumed new fill thicknesses of 2 to 10 feet and evaluated both primary and secondary • <br /> consolidation settlement. We also evaluated a surcharge program that consists of adding 5-and <br /> 10-foot-thick surcharges above final grade and estimated the amount of time required to achieve • <br /> approximately 100 percent of primary and 90 percent of secondary consolidation. We assumed <br /> a surcharge unit weight of 115 pcf and a 50-year design life in our calculations. <br /> • <br /> As previously discussed, documented surcharges have previously been placed over most of the • <br /> western half of the property. We understand that these surcharges were left in place for at least • <br /> two years. Figure 3 shows the locations of the previous surcharges. In our opinion, it is not • <br /> necessary to place new surcharge in areas that have previously been surcharged, since the <br /> 411 <br /> underlying soil has already been sufficiently consolidated. <br /> 40 <br /> 5.2.3 Estimate of Settlement Magnitude and Duration • <br /> The amount of consolidation settlement that we estimate will occur in the silt and organic silt • <br /> layer from new structural fill is shown in Table 2. Interpolation can be used to obtain settlement <br /> estimates for other loading or surcharge scenarios. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 41 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> G EODESIGNY. 8 Polygon-128-01:091615 • <br /> • <br />