Laserfiche WebLink
will likely occur. The tolerable magnitude of long-term settlement for the design of the <br /> structures and site improvements should be discussed with the structural engineer and included <br /> in the report, as well as appropriate mitigation measures. <br /> RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENT 10 <br /> The goal for the project is to limit static settlement to approximately 2 inches. We are proposing <br /> that a surcharge be used to induce approximately 90 percent of the settlement that would be <br /> caused by raising grades to final grades. We anticipate that settlement beneath buildings due to <br /> the decomposition of organic material will be minor. We recommend that building footings be <br /> supported on soil that has been adequately improved or that additional explorations be <br /> performed to confirm that organics are not present in the fill layer beneath footings that could <br /> cause long-term settlement. The layer of hard silt that is occasionally present beneath the layer <br /> of soft to medium stiff silt is not susceptible to consolidation settlement. Seismic settlement is a <br /> separate issue related to life safety during an earthquake. We will discuss seismic settlement in <br /> our comprehensive geotechnical report for the project. Mitigation measures for static and <br /> seismic settlement, when applicable, will be discussed in our comprehensive geotechnical report <br /> for the project. <br /> REVIEW COMMENT 11 <br /> Page 4 of the report states that settlement monitoring should occur due to the highly variable <br /> nature of the fill. The report should describe the settlement monitoring plan recommended for <br /> this site, especially given the variable subsurface conditions in the fill and native soils. At a <br /> minimum, settlement plates should be placed along the alignment of all the major utility pipes <br /> and at the proposed building locations. Settlement plates would typically be read daily during <br /> placement of the surcharge (referring to statement on Page 7). <br /> RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENT 11 <br /> We have installed 16 settlement plates at the site,which corresponds to approximately <br /> 1 settlement plate per acre. This is the same settlement plate density that is being used at the <br /> nearby Polygon Simpson site. We installed settlement plates 4, 8, and 13 along the alignment of <br /> the City's 48-inch and 72-inch sewer lines. We installed the remaining settlement plates at <br /> various proposed building and roadway locations. In our opinion, the 16 settlement plates we <br /> have installed will be adequate for monitoring settlement at the site. We propose to take survey <br /> readings on the settlement plates at a rate of at least twice per week while fill or surcharge is <br /> being placed and for at least one additional month following the placement of fill or surcharge. <br /> After the additional month, settlement readings should be collected weekly. <br /> REVIEW COMMENT 12 <br /> Page 5. Please confirm that the crest of the surcharge should extend at least 10 feet beyond the <br /> limits of the building and pavement areas. <br /> G EODESIGN= 6 Polygon-128-01:081 1 15 <br />