My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4800 DOGWOOD DR 2022-02-28
>
Address Records
>
DOGWOOD DR
>
4800
>
4800 DOGWOOD DR 2022-02-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2022 9:31:47 AM
Creation date
7/12/2021 11:36:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
DOGWOOD DR
Street Number
4800
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Wetland name or number A <br /> SLOPE WETLANDS <br /> Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion <br /> S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? <br /> S 4.1.Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate <br /> for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland.Stems of plants should be thick enough(usually>1/8 <br /> in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. 0 <br /> 0 Dense,uncut, rigid plants cover>90%of the area of the wetland points=1 <br /> E All other conditions points=0 <br /> Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1=M ✓ 0=L Record the rating on the first page <br /> S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? <br /> S 5.1. Is more than 25%of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess 1 <br /> surface runoff? Yes=1 No=0 <br /> Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: ✓ 1=M 0=L Record the rating on the first page <br /> S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? <br /> S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: <br /> nThe sub-basin immediately down-gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or <br /> natural resources(e.g., houses or salmon redds) points=2 0 <br /> QSurface flooding problems are in a sub-basin farther down-gradient points=1 <br /> ® No flooding problems anywhere downstream points=0 <br /> S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? 0 <br /> Yes=2INo=0I <br /> Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above 0 <br /> Rating of Value If score is:_2-4=H 1=M ✓ 0=L Record the rating on the first page <br /> NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Herbaceous vegetation varies in this wetland and is dense in places and sparse in others. It is not practical to <br /> try to map as we were only able to observe a small portion of the wetland that is on and adjacent to the <br /> subject property and tree cover precludes us from seeing how dense the herbaceous layer is via aerial photos. <br /> We estimate that dense vegetation covers more than half of the wetland based on the portion we saw, but not <br /> more than 90%. <br /> Rigid plants including giant horsetail (Equisetum telmateia) and skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanus) occur <br /> densely in a small portion of the area we observed. The areas shown as belonging to the 'emergent' class <br /> consist almost exclusively of bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara), which is not "rigid." We estimate <br /> that dense, uncut, rigid plants make up less than half of the wetland area. (Again, it is not practical to map <br /> these as we only saw a small portion of the wetland and the distribution of the dense and sparse areas form a <br /> mosaic.) <br /> Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 12 <br /> Rating Form—Effective January 1,2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.