Laserfiche WebLink
Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, <br />View Ridge Community Church Addition and Geotechnical Engineering Report <br />Everett, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations <br />parameters for the analysis included slope geometry, geology, soil strength parameters, and <br />seismic conditions. For evaluation of slope stability under seismic conditions, a horizontal <br />ground acceleration of 0.30g was used for our analysis; this value is equivalent to half of the <br />peak horizontal ground acceleration. Soil strength parameters used for our analysis were <br />assumed based on typical published values for similar materials and our prior experience. The <br />values assumed for our analysis are shown on the Slope/W profiles included in Appendix B. The <br />slope geometry used for our analysis was based on a topographic survey of the church <br />property. Cross -Section A -A' shown on Figure 2 was selected for our analysis. <br />The stability of a slope can be expressed in terms of its factor of safety. The factor of safety is <br />the ratio between the forces that resist sliding to the forces that drive sliding. For example, a <br />factor of safety of 1.0 would indicate a slope where the driving forces and the resisting forces <br />are exactly equal. Increasing factor of safety values greater than 1.0 indicate increased <br />stability. Factors of safety below 1.0 indicate conditions where the driving forces exceed <br />resisting forces and landsliding is imminent. We recommend minimum factors of safety equal <br />to 1.5 for static conditions and 1.1 for dynamic (seismic) conditions. Factors of safety equal to <br />3.3 and 1.4 were calculated for deep-seated failure at the setback buffer for the proposed <br />addition under static and seismic conditions, respectively. Minimum factors of safety of 2.6 and <br />1.3 under static and seismic conditions, respectively, were calculated for critical deep-seated <br />failure surfaces for the steep slope area. Copies of the Slope/W profiles, the soil strength <br />parameters used for our analysis, and the calculated minimum factors of safety are provided in <br />Appendix B. <br />Given the lack of indications of historical landslide activity on the site and the calculated factors <br />of safety for deep-seated failure near the proposed addition exceeding the minimum values, it <br />is our opinion that the risk of damage to the subject site under either static or seismic <br />conditions is low. Consequently, we consider a minimum of 25-foot slope setback buffer for <br />the proposed addition to be adequate. <br />6.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS <br />Earthquakes occur regularly in the Puget Lowland. The majority of these events are small and <br />are usually not felt by people. However, large earthquakes do occur, as evidenced by the 1949, <br />7.2-magnitude event; the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; and the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event. The <br />1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and <br />was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an <br />earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely every 20 to 40 years in the Puget <br />Sound area. <br />August 29, 2016 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. <br />SKL11d - KE160351A2 - ProjectsJ20160351JKEJWP Page 6 <br />