Laserfiche WebLink
f. <br />u AN COMPANY FIELD REP BT <br />DESIGNK 1 of3 <br />Project Name: Everett River Front- Simpson Report: 179 <br />__.._........_......._..._......_._......................._.........._._:....�.._.___..._...__............._.........._..........._....__......_....................._...................._..................._...._..........._.__..._........................_.................................. _ . _ ....._................._......._............................_.........._.......... <br />GeoDesign #: Polygon-127-03 Date: 1/16/2020 <br />Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br />PW1505-005 <br />Randy Allen (City of Everett) Michelle Dittman (Polygon) Weather: Sunny, 30's <br />Ron Bowen (Polygon) Amy Pickett (Superior Concrete) _ Arri�parture: 1230/1330 <br />Distribution: -- <br />Kyler Meek (Polygon) <br />...................................................................................................... <br />................................................................................................................................. ,... ................................ .......... .................................................... ...... <br />......................................................................................... . <br />Stephen Farnan (Polygon) ( Prepared B Aubrey Hodgins <br />Yg p Y........................................._ ......................._.... <br />m Site Plan(s) ❑ Density Test Summary 1 Signature: <br />��J <br />Attachments: i- - ` - ���`_ .._.._.t J.".� ..._.._._._._.............. <br />❑ Installation Records ❑ Other Reviewed By: 2 z T.. 1. <br />PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Aubrey Hodgins, was on -site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br />observe foundation subgrade for Lot 361. <br />SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIONS: <br />Lot 361: <br />Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the foundation and crawl space area for Lot 361. We <br />noted that the exposed foundation subgrade generally consisted of a gray silty SAND with gravel that could be probed less <br />than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. No over -excavation was necessary for Lot 361. <br />Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade was tested using a Troxler Moisture -Density gauge; in -place <br />density tests indicated that the exposed material had been compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density as <br />determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br />It is our opinion that the exposed foundation subgrade for Lot 361 observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br />intended structure. A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. The contractor was notified of our <br />observations prior to our departure from the site. <br />This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br />specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor, the contractor's employees <br />or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety. This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations, testing, and preliminary recommendations. The report can only be considered <br />final upon review ofthe GeoDesign project manager, as indicated by initials in the "Reviewed By'section. <br />10700 Meridian Avenue North, Suite 402 1 Seattle, WA 98133 1 206.838.9900 <br />2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma, WA 98402 1 253.203.0095 <br />