My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Interwest Construction Inc. 9/29/2021 Change Order 27
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
Interwest Construction Inc. 9/29/2021 Change Order 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2021 2:00:49 PM
Creation date
10/1/2021 2:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
Interwest Construction Inc.
Approval Date
9/29/2021
Council Approval Date
9/15/2021
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Heather Griffin/Mike Kangas/Tom Hood
Subject / Project Title
Grand Avenue Park Bridge
Amendment/Change Order
Change Order
Amendment/Change Order Number
27
Tracking Number
PW3588
Total Compensation
$14,549.56
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Attest: Approved As to Form: <br /> Office of the City At;r— <br /> APPROVED AS IC", c..; <br /> D,n David G.Nall, Cit. <br /> -;1 . <br /> or City Clerk City Attorney <br /> Date: ( Date: g-/ Date: •r. L g, 2' <br /> Recommended By: <br /> Construction Project Engineer(if Engineering Manager Department Director <br /> Manager(if applicable) (if applicable) <br /> applicable) <br /> coif <br /> Date: 3/ zoz I D . D . -31•Zo2( <br /> Exhibit A—Description of Changed Work <br /> This Change Order No. 27 adds one new bid item in Schedule B as shown below. <br /> New Item #B125-Unit Price Reconciliation. Add new item#B-125 entitled, "Unit Price <br /> Reconciliation" at the calculated Lump Sum Price of$14,549.56, resulting in a Contract increase of <br /> $14,549.56. <br /> Justification <br /> Five bid items in Change Order 25 mistakenly applied credit to the contract value. These credits should <br /> have only been applied to the pay estimate. The result was understating the correct value of the <br /> contract by $138,080.52. This correction to the contract value does not change the amount paid to the <br /> Contractor, but rather corrects an accounting error. <br /> At the completion of the project there were unit price and force account under-runs of$123,530.96. <br /> These funds will not be spent. <br /> Correcting the final contract value by adding $138,080.52 and deducting the $123,530.96 in under- <br /> runs results in a net final Change Order amount of$14,549.56. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.