Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Everett Warehouse <br />ZipperGeo Project No. 2152.01 <br />March 5, 2019 <br />feet below existing site grade. Many of the samples obtained from borings B-1 through B-3 had trace organics <br />consisting of woody and vegetative debris along with a faint organic odor. Based on sample blow counts and <br />observed organics, we interpret soils observed in borings B-1 through B-3 as previously placed, <br />undocumented fill. The term undocumented fill refers to fill placed apparently without documentation of <br />placement, compaction, and compaction testing. We conducted some research including contacting the <br />Washington State Department of Natural Resources in an attempt to locate documentation of fill placement <br />at the site. Our research found no documentation of fill placement at the site. <br />Based on our review of a 1969 aerial photograph along with soil conditions observed in borings and test pits, <br />it appears historic grading has occurred at the site. The grading is likely related to historic gravel mining and <br />gravel mine reclamation in the vicinity. Some of the soil conditions observed in the test pits appeared <br />consistent with native glacial till soils including cemented till -like clasts. However, a conclusive identification <br />of soils observed in the test pit explorations as glacial till could not be determined. However, most of the soils <br />observed in our explorations appear to have been derived from a till -like source. As indicated above, geologic <br />mapping indicates the site is underlain by glacial till. However, our borings revealed soil conditions not <br />consistent with the geologic mapping to the depths explored (about 40 feet below existing site grade). As <br />such, based on engineering judgement, we concluded that soils encountered in many of our explorations are <br />likely undocumented fill soils. <br />Groundwater Conditions <br />Slow groundwater seepage was observed in test pits TP-1, TP-4, TP-5, TP-7, TP-8, and TP-10 at depths ranging <br />from about 1 to 5 feet below existing site grade. Groundwater observed in the above -noted test pits is <br />interpreted to be a thin saturated zone perched atop relatively impermeable soils below. Groundwater was <br />not encountered in borings B-1 through B-3 at the time of drilling. Groundwater monitoring wells were <br />installed in borings B-1 and B-2 with the screening interval located between about 30 to 40 feet below existing <br />site grade. The wells were checked for water levels on March 4, 2019 and found to be dry. Fluctuations in <br />groundwater levels and flow rates will likely occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, <br />runoff and other factors not evident at the time the explorations were performed. Therefore, <br />groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the life of the project may be higher than <br />indicated on the logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered when <br />developing the design and construction plans for the project. <br />Summary of Laboratory Testing <br />Laboratory testing was completed on select soil samples obtained from the explorations. Moisture content <br />testing revealed moisture contents ranging from about 7 to 19 percent with an average of about 10.4 percent. <br />Moisture content of individually tested samples are shown on the logs. A Modified Proctor test completed <br />on a sample obtained from test pit TP-3 at a depth of about 3 feet below existing site grade. The was <br />completed in general accordance with the ASTM D1557 test method and revealed an optimum moisture <br />content of about 8 percent and a maximum dry density of about 138 pounds per cubic foot. Organic content <br />testing was completed on 5 samples obtained from borings B-1 through B-3 at depths ranging from 10 to 20 <br />Page 3 <br />