Laserfiche WebLink
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS <br />This is an agreement ("Agreement") between Michael W. Weaver and his marital <br />community, Amy Weaver, (referred to in this agreement as "you"), and the City of Everett <br />(referred to in this agreement as the "City," "us," or "we"). This Agreement is dated for reference <br />purposes the day of September, 2021, which is the date we delivered this Agreement to you <br />for your consideration. The terms of this Agreement are contingent on approval by the City of <br />Everett City Council. <br />RECITALS <br />Whereas, Michael W. Weaver was employed by the City of Everett Fire Department <br />beginning in 1996; <br />Whereas, in 2011 Michael W. Weaver was diagnosed with melanoma on his upper <br />scapula, and following diagnosis, Michael W. Weaver made an occupational disease claim <br />against the City of Everett under RCW 51 et seq.; <br />Whereas, during that claim Michael W. Weaver was represented by Ron Meyers and <br />Associates and following a hearing, on February 11, 2013, the Board of Industrial Insurance <br />Appeals determined that Mr. Weaver's condition, diagnosed as melanoma, did not arise naturally <br />and proximately out of the distinctive conditions of his employment with the City of Everett Fire <br />Department, the statutory presumption of RCW 51.32.185 had been rebutted by a preponderance <br />of the evidence, his melanoma was not an occupational disease under RCW 51.08.140, and the <br />Department of Labor and Industries correctly rejected the claim; <br />Whereas, in January 2014, Michael W. Weaver received a diagnosis of malignant <br />melanoma, after his medical team discovered that he had metastatic brain cancer originating <br />from his prior melanoma; <br />Whereas, Michael W. Weaver filed a second occupational disease claim with the City of <br />Everett under RCW 51 et seq., alleging that his malignant melanoma was the result of his <br />employment with the City of Everett; <br />Whereas, the above -referenced malignant melanoma claim became the subject of <br />extended litigation between Weaver and the City, culminating in the decision of the Washington <br />Supreme Court in Weaver v. City of Everett, 194 Wn.2d 464, 450 P.3d 177 (2019), in which the <br />Supreme Court determined that Mr. Weaver's second malignant melanoma claim was not <br />foreclosed by the rejection of his originating melanoma claim; <br />Whereas, since the time of the Supreme Court decision, Weaver and the City have <br />endeavored to resolve all disputes between them since, on the one hand, Mr. Weaver believes <br />and continues to assert that his malignant melanoma was the result of exposures which occurred <br />during his employment by the City of Everett, and the City of Everett has continued to assert that <br />Page 1 of 9 <br />