My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 7700
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 7700
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2021 10:02:15 AM
Creation date
10/22/2021 9:59:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
7700
Date
10/6/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix B: Community Input Summary Everett Housing Action Plan B-16 <br /> <br />Single Family Home Ownership; Non-traditional <br />accessory dwelling units. allows existing residents to have some control. <br /> Has community feeling You are renting to people who you want to be neighbors with <br />Town housing appropriate scale can accommodate families. approachable for neighbors <br />Home ownership program; similar to CHIP; program that maintains value of neighborhood <br />Utilize vacant lots/space adjacent to SFR (ex: ADU/DADU); preserve existing homes <br />students and hospital staff appreciate live in SF home but have their own space <br />Government support for multiple family housing <br />Maintain existing equity in homeownership by increasing opp. for additional units on established SFR lots <br />2. Under what conditions could you support a scenario where different housing types could be introduced into <br />existing single-family neighborhoods? In other words, what limitations or measures are necessary to <br />accompany allowing different housing types in single family neighborhoods? <br />Breakout Room 1 - Q2 <br />Challenges with biases against lower-income, etc. homeowners <br />Not a lot of opposition to some duplexes <br /> <br />Breakout Room 2 - Q2 <br />Sidewalks! Greenspace! Parking! <br />Housing Hope example. Supportive housing/ affordable housing is badly needed. <br /> More mixing with neighborhoods - spread it out <br />Affordability... <br /> <br />Breakout Room 3 - Q2 <br />zone for multi family housing <br />re examine building heights <br />walkability and access to public transit <br /> <br />Breakout Room 4 - Q2 <br />Must be built to endure - good maintainable detailing and materials <br />Improved collaboration with Historic Commission in residential development to keep neighborhood character. <br />Adaptations on housing needs from similar cities, such as Seattle <br />Must be respectful of scale and architectural style most everything this can fit in. <br />More teeth in design review process would help <br />Allow for DADU/ADU rentals without homeowner stipulation <br />Increasing home ownership <br />Second "more teeth" input; allowing for non-historic to obtain compliance as well; have design committee <br />beyond historic overlays
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.