Resolution 7700 - Laserfiche WebLink

Appendix B: Community Input Summary Everett Housing Action Plan B-23 For a lot of this recommendations – how do you make it make it easier for developers or to modify existing neighborhoods but their character? Breakout Room 3 – Q2 Keep lower heights of MF in SF to not block sun on adjacent properties. Need to be ready to compromise. Baker Heights design townhouse style with green spaces. Need a larger area in order to accomplish this. MF development will be spotty initially if infill only on one lot within SF neighborhood. The transit corridors proposed previously, were too large and extended too far into SF neighborhoods. Height transitioning important. Need to open up more opportunities for home ownership. Oregon approach to legalize denser infill in SF neighborhoods. Need feasible approaches. 3 story condo but would prefer a townhouse with a small yard, want to be close to amenities. Walkability of ¼-1/2 mile distance. Grocery store to avoid food deserts. North Everett is very walkable—Grand Av bridge. Green roofs, dog walks, Silver Lake area. Shared green space community gathering spaces. Two, 2 story fourplex with shared open space with places to sit. Green spaces along alleys. Need better sidewalks. Need to keep and expand parks. Consider park districts. Play areas for kids in a shared green space. Types of housing should have mixed use with on lower levels. Look at what Lynnwood housing near light rail. Housing for elderly living independently--ADUs. Make ADU permitting much easier. Breakout Room 4 – Q2 Worried about shade and property lines – design can address this Plex conversions from SFH doesn’t look like it fits Parking is a hot button issue – North Everett on-street parking Parking spots are expensive Housing Hope – Rezoning for 44-unit housing What would they accept Asking neighborhoods what would they accept Way of life versus development Not representative meeting What is the right location – Reactive/Proactive