Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> 11. The City provided the Respondents with an opportunity to correct the conditions that were <br /> in violation of sections of the EMC and provided notice of the date,time and place of this <br /> hearing. The Respondents appeared at the hearing with legal representation. <br /> Based on the above findings of fact,the Violations Hearing Examiner enters the following <br /> conclusions: <br /> CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> Jurisdiction: <br /> Pursuant to EMC Chapter 1.20 or any Everett Municipal Code provisions that identify EMC <br /> Chapter 1.20 for enforcement,the Violations.Hearing Examiner of the City of Everett has <br /> jurisdictional authority to hold this hearing and to issue the decision. EMC 1.20.020. <br /> Applicable Law: <br /> 1. IPMC 106.1 Unlawful acts,which reads: <br /> It shall be unlawful for a person,firm or corporation to be in conflict with or in violation of <br /> any of the provisions of this code. <br /> 2. IPMC 108.1.4 Unlawful Structure,which reads: <br /> An unlawful structure is one found in whole or in part to be occupied by more persons than <br /> permitted under this code, or was erected, altered or occupied contrary to law. <br /> 3. IRC R105.1 Permit required,which reads: <br /> Any owner or authorized agent who intends to construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, <br /> demolish or change the occupancy of a building or structure, or to erect, install, enlarge, <br /> alter, repair, remove, convert or replace any electrical,gas, mechanical or plumbing <br /> system, the installation of which is regulated by this code, or cause any such work to be <br /> done, shall first make application to the building official and obtain the required permit. <br /> Conclusions of Law Based on Above Findings: <br /> 1. Construction activity conducted on property within the City of Everett without required City <br /> permits is a violation of IRC R105.1. The record demonstrates said City ordinance was <br /> violated. <br /> 2. Unpermitted construction work conducted on the property renders the structure unlawful as <br /> defined by IPMC 108.1.4 and is a violation of IPMC 106.1. The record demonstrates said <br /> City ordinance was violated. <br /> ORDER <br /> Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law stated above, it is hereby determined that 1 <br /> the Respondents allowed violation of IPMC 106.1 and IRC R105.1 on the subject property and <br /> are hereby ordered as follows: <br /> 4 1\0 <br />