My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4735 GLENHAVEN DR Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
GLENHAVEN DR
>
4735
>
Geotech Report
>
4735 GLENHAVEN DR Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:56:54 PM
Creation date
11/17/2021 2:34:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
GLENHAVEN DR
Street Number
4735
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No. 1113119 <br /> Dutton Foundation Stabilization and Slope Evaluation July 3,2019 I�� <br /> Everett,Washington Page 5 <br /> Landslide Hazard/Slope Stability <br /> The criteria used for evaluation of landslide hazards include soil type, slope gradient, and groundwater <br /> conditions. Site slopes range in inclination from moderately to gently in the west,to steeply east facing in <br /> the east. Site slopes were measured to be up to 33 degrees (65 percent grade). We did not observe <br /> evidence of recent sloughing events or deep-seated landslides on the site slopes, or groundwater seepage <br /> emitting from the slope. It is our opinion that the core of the slope is stable and that the recommended pin <br /> piles should terminate in stable soils. Inclinations in the range of 33 degrees on the slope indicate internal <br /> strength and a high internal friction angle within the underlying soils. It is our opinion that while there is <br /> potential for erosion,soil creep,and shallow failures within the loose surficial and undocumented fill soils <br /> on the site slopes, there is not a significant potential for deep-seated slope failures under current site <br /> conditions. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> General <br /> Based on our observations, our understanding of the existing foundation conditions, and the presence of <br /> loose fill soils underlying the foundations, it is our opinion that the settlement and distress to the <br /> residence is a direct result of on-going consolidation of loose undocumented fill soils that exist below the <br /> residence addition foundations. These soils will likely continue to experience settlement and subsidence <br /> under the current loads, and at an increased rate as a result of an earthquake or significant amount of <br /> rainfall, which could lead to more distress to the addition foundation and structure. To mitigate this <br /> condition and support the residence, the existing residence foundation should be underpinned by a deep <br /> foundation system,such as pin piles. <br /> We recommend that at a minimum, the exterior foundation lines of the residence addition on the <br /> southeastern side of the house be supported on deep foundations consisting of driven pin piles,to transfer <br /> the building loads through the loose undocumented fill down to the underlying competent native soils. <br /> Your structural engineer should consult with us to determine the extent of foundation areas to be <br /> underpinned, and overall layout of the underpinning system. Portions of the residence may be able to be <br /> re-leveled under the direction of the structural engineer and the contractor. We should review <br /> underpinning plans prior to implementation. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES,INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.