2117 LINCOLN ST T MOBILE ANTENNA 2018-01-02 MF Import

(k) Accessibility to public traffic measures proposed by he Appiaantt reduce dependence of the proposed use on the automobile. In addition to the General Evaluation crit&a, Specific Evaluation criteria for Special Property Use Permits, as set forth in EMC 19.41.150.D.1.b, must be satisfied. Those criteria include: (a) Major utility and communications facilities shall be designed, landscapedor otherwise screened to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties. Above ground utility and communications structures and antennas shall be designed, constructed, painted and screened so as to blend with surrounding uses and buildings. The review authority may impose additional restrictions on the location, setbacks, height, design, landscaping and screening of above ground itility and communications facilities if necessary to minimize visual impacts and promote greater compatibility with existing or planned uses on surrounding properties. (b) Antennas associated with above ground utility or communications facilities shall be on existing or replacement towers or structures to the maximum extent technically feasible to discourage the proliferation of tower structures. Installation or co -location of antennas on existing or replacement towers or structures shall be preferred unless the proponent can demonstrate that a new structure is necessary to adequately serve the needs of the: public. When proposed to be installed on an existing or replacement tower or structure located in a nonresidential zone located at least three hundred feet from residential zones, facilities whish are subject to Review Process II shall be reviewed using Review Process I, subject to meeting all requirements of this section. When proposed to be located on an existing or replacement utility or communications structure or other nonresidential structure in a residential zone, Review Process II shall be required. (c) Tower structures for above ground utility and/or communications facilities shall not be located in or within three hundred feet of residentially zoned areas, in or within two hundred feet of gateway corridors as designated by the Everett comprehensive plan, or in or wiihin two hundred feet of areas under the jurisdiction of the shoreline master program, unless the applicant provides an analysis of alternative sites and existing facilities which are technically feasible where the structure could be located or co - located which demonstrates that the proposed facility cannot adequately serve the needs of the public for the proposed utility or communications service in an alternative location. When location in or within two hundred feet of a gateway corridor, or in or within two hundred feet of areas under the jurisdiction of the shoreline master program, is necessary to serve the public need for utility or communications services, use of existing or