Laserfiche WebLink
Ted de Budden <br /> From: Ted de Budden <br /> Sent: Wednesday,January 22, 2020 9:12 AM <br /> To: Jason Maloy <br /> Cc: Tony Lee; David Foster; Donald Cunningham;Jeff Heilman <br /> Subject: RE: Leese Project - 5316 S.4th Ave <br /> Hello Jason, <br /> I researched this issue again as requested. <br /> The original permit for this house when it was constructed (# 10793) issued on 1/19/1970 documented that the house <br /> was a One story Dwelling with Basement. <br /> The attic area has never been approved for occupied space and is not currently approved for habitation. <br /> Also,the small window size of the attic windows does not meet the minimum requirements for light(IPMC 402) nor <br /> (Ventilation) IPMC 403)for Habitable space. <br /> Regards <br /> Ted de Budden <br /> ImChief Inspector I Permit Services <br /> 425.257-72711 3200 Cedar Street, 2nd Floor, Everett,WA 98201 <br /> EVERETT Hours: Monday—Friday 7:30am-12:00pm and 1:00pm-4:00pm <br /> everettwa.gov I Facebook I Twitter <br /> Note:Emails and attachments sent to and from the City of Everett are public records and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Public <br /> Records Act. <br /> From:Jason Maloy<JMaloy@everettwa.gov> <br /> Sent:Tuesday,January 21, 2020 3:00 PM <br /> To:Jeff Heilman<JHeilman@everettwa.gov>;Ted de Budden<TBudden@everettwa.gov> <br /> Subject: RE: Leese Project-5316 S.4th Ave <br /> Good Afternoon Jeff/Ted, <br /> I met out onsite today with the Contractor and David Foster(building inspector). <br /> We showed him all of the corrections that were made to address the code enforcement issues and he seemed to think <br /> that everything looked pretty good. <br /> He also verified that the existing covered attic spaced and bathroom met height requirements for occupancy, but with <br /> the exception that the windows do not meet current egress requirements.That being said, please see the attached <br /> County Assessor's Field Notes and notice that the attic bedroom windows were installed since original construction.This <br /> should mean that they would have met code back when the house was built.Also,the original plumbing permit <br /> application shows 2 toilets(one for each bathroom)which is further proof that the attic bathroom was part of original <br /> construction. <br /> All of this said,we will still need your direction on whether or not any additional corrections are needed in the attic <br /> bathroom. <br /> Please let me know as soon as you are able so I can provide direction to the Contractor on how we are to move forward. <br /> 1IL <br />