2102 60TH ST SE 2022-01-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Steve and Crista Wilkes • I Plan Check Number: B2007-006, First Building Review August 7, 2020 Comments 1. The submitted drawings are not sufficient for a complete review to be performed at this time. Construction-level drawings should be submitted for review. Preliminary review comments have been provided to assist in revising the construction drawings. Additional comments may be provided pending a review of the revised submittal documents. Handouts and Checklists are provided by Permit Services to assist in the preparation of the construction drawings: https://everettwa.gov/169/Permit-Services. See IRC Section 106.1.1. This comment does not require a response. A) We have worked up new drawings they are attached but will also be dropped off in tote to the office today. 2. The existing condition of the building is not consistent with the City of Everett permit history for this building. Review of our records and the Snohomish County Assessor's Office records indicate original construction that is not consistent with the current condition. Documentation substantiating that modifications have been performed with permits should be submitted for review. Alternatively, modifications that have been previously performed without a permit should be shown in the drawings as new construction and should comply with the full requirements of the 2015 IRC. The applicant is responsible for investigating and identifying all unpermitted work that has been performed. See Sections R102.7.1, R105.1, R105.4, 106.1.1, and R113. Unpermitted work includes but is not limited to: a. Additions on the south side of the building, located on the east and west sides of the existing 7-foot by 7-foot rear entryway. Note that this work has occurred in the rear site setbacks. Contact the City of Everett Planning Department for additional information. A) Per the email given by Drew with confirmation from Kelsey, we will be able to move forward with our permit for the dormer and deck without addressing the back at this time. It has been turned over to the Code enforcement. Also note that we have updated the site plan that shows the correct boundaries and that the previous plans had a 4ft set back when it fact is it much more. In looking at the site plan from the city our neighbors put their fence and driveway on part of our property. This is not an issue to us but note the set back is ok. Again we will deal with this at a later date, if we have to. 3. Site plan per IRC Section R106.2. The plan should specify lot setbacks (EMC and IRC Section R106.2), building fire separation distances (IRC Sections R202 and R302), utilities (IRC Sections R306.3 and R306.4), and means of egress from the building to the public way (IRC Section 311.1). All work should be drawn to a standard engineering scale (e.g., 1"=10', etc.). A) See updated site plans 4. All work should be drawn to a standard architectural scale (e.g., 1/4"=1'=0", etc.). The scale(s) should be specified in the drawings. See Section 106.1.1. A) See updated plans O3200 Cedar Street © 425.257.8810 O everetteps@everettwa.gov Everett,WA 98201 425.257.8857 fax everettwa.gov/permits Page 2 of 3