320 89TH ST SE 2022-01-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Drew Martin From: Drew Martin Sent: Thursday,January 7, 2021 2:19 PM To: dangarvida@gmail.com Subject: City of Everett Permit Services: 320 89th Street SE (B2012-042) - Building Intake First Review Mr. Dan Garvida, Your application has been received and a permit set up. However, the submitted documents are not sufficient for us to perform a review at this time. The Planning Department has also determined that the project is not sufficient to perform a review; they will issue a comment letter separately. Revised construction-level drawings need to be submitted for review. Preliminary comments are provided below to assist in revising the drawings, but these are not intended to provide a comprehensive review. 1. The drawings must be sealed and signed if prepared by a licensed architect. 2. The proposed project involves converting a single-family residence into an adult family home (AFH). See the following link for the required forms and documents: https://everettwa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/108/Adult-family-home-checklist-PDF 3. Continuing with the previous comment, the building plans show 10 bedrooms, indicating at least 10 residents. The WA State building code limits AFHs to 8 residents. 4. The east 12-foot by 50-foot portion of the building is an unpermitted edition. Based on a review of the City of Everett and Snohomish County records, this portion is not part of the original building. It appears the building started as an unpermitted 20-foot square covered patio at the north east corner, and was subsequently expanded and enclosed. Planning has similarly reviewed this area and found it to not comply with the municipal code. This area must either be permitted as new construction or demolished. 5. Continuing with the previous comment, the construction drawings should be revised to show the east portion as a new addition. The addition is required to comply with the full requirements of the building code for new construction. 6. Continuing with the previous comment,the addition is required to comply with the WSEC for energy credits. 7. The existing building appears to have previous unpermitted construction. For example,the number and type of bathrooms shown in Demolition Plan 2/A-101 is not consistent with the County records. Other unpermitted work may exist. The house should be thoroughly reviewed for unpermitted work. Unpermitted work should be documented in the plans as new construction and is required to comply with the current building code requirements. 8. The proposed demolition appears to potentially eliminate bearing walls supporting the roof. Per previous comments, it appears that previous interior modification may have similarly altered the load path. Framing plans should be provided substantiating the roof framing plan and the supporting load path to the foundation. Plans and details for new framing should be provided, including foundations. Provide material specifications and fastener requirements; references to code tables are not sufficient. Review of your project will be performed in the order received once the required documentation has been submitted. Please let me know if you have questions.