Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No.961916 <br /> Mason Residence Addition and Deck August 24,2016 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 7 25 <br /> The proposed residence addition is planned to be as close as approximately 25 to 30 feet from the top of <br /> the existing steep northeast-facing ravine slope. The proposed deck expansion is planned to be as close as <br /> 10 to 15 feet from the top of the steep northeast-facing ravine slope. We recommend that the proposed <br /> addition foundations and deck foundations within the lower portion of the deck area along the top of the <br /> steep slope be supported on 4-inch driven steel pin piles extending through the upper undocumented fills <br /> and be embedded into the competent native glacial soils at depth. We anticipate that the pin piles will <br /> extend a minimum of 15 to 20 feet below the existing ground surface within the vicinity of the proposed <br /> addition and deck expansion. It is our opinion that the proposed addition and deck foundation setback <br /> along with supporting the basement addition and deck foundations closest to the top of slope on 4-inch <br /> driven pin piles embedded into the competent native soils should be adequate for this project. The <br /> proposed setback and deep foundation elements should limit the impacts of the proposed development on <br /> the slope and allow for normal slope recession and shallow failures during a reasonable life span of the <br /> structure. This is further discussed in the Structure Setback subsection of this report. <br /> If slab-on-grades are planned for this project, we recommend that at a minimum, the slab subgrade be <br /> over-excavated by a minimum of two feet and the over-excavation backfilled with 2-inch crushed rock. <br /> Soft or yielding areas exposed at the bottom of the slab excavation should be further over-excavated and <br /> replaced with 2-inch crushed rock. This method should reduce the potential for future differential <br /> settlement and cracking of the slab; however, some settlement, differential settlement, and minor slab <br /> cracking should still be expected over time, as some of the undocumented fill would remain underneath <br /> the slab. Additional steel reinforcement in the slab and incorporating ample cold joints may reduce the <br /> effects of settlement. If settlement or slab distress of any kind cannot be tolerated, the slab-on-grade <br /> should be designed as structural slab and supported on pin piles. This is discussed further in the Slab-on- <br /> Grade subsection of this report. <br /> We also observed numerous drain pipes within the steep slope area along the northeastern property line <br /> below the residence. We were unable to determine the extent of these drains during our site visit, but we <br /> anticipate that these drains may be associated with the residence roof and footing drains or the <br /> neighboring residence drains. We recommend that all residence downspouts and yard drains be <br /> investigated to understand where they are directed and verify they are functioning as intended. At a <br /> minimum, we recommend that all residence downspouts and yard drains be tightlined and directed to <br /> discharge at the bottom of the slopes or to a suitable discharge location within the roadway above. This is <br /> discussed further in the Site Drainage subsection of this report. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />