My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WA ST Dept of Ecology 2/15/2022
>
Contracts
>
Agreement
>
Interlocal Agreements
>
WA ST Dept of Ecology 2/15/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 7:10:18 AM
Creation date
3/4/2022 11:16:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
WA ST Dept of Ecology
Approval Date
2/15/2022
End Date
12/31/2026
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
John Rabenow
Subject / Project Title
Nutrient General Program Discharge Permit
Tracking Number
0003215
Total Compensation
$0.00
Contract Type
Agreement
Contract Subtype
Interlocal Agreements
Retention Period
6 Years Then Destroy
Imported from EPIC
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E. NUTRIENT REDUCTION EVALUATION <br /> 1. Permittees in Table 8, except for those who meet the exclusions listed in this <br /> paragraph, must prepare and submit an approvable Nutrient Reduction <br /> Evaluation (NRE) to Ecology for review by December 31, 2025. Permittees with <br /> multiple plants may submit a combined report. This combined report must <br /> include an evaluation for all plants owned and operated by the jurisdiction. <br /> Permittees that maintain an annual TIN average of< 10 mg/L and meet their <br /> action level throughout the permit term must submit a truncated NRE that <br /> satisfies S5.E.3-S5.E.5. Permittees that meet their action level throughout the <br /> permit term, maintain an annual average of< 10 mg/L TIN and a seasonal <br /> average of< 3 mg/L do not have to submit the NRE. <br /> 2. The NRE must include an all known, available and reasonable treatment (AKART) <br /> analysis for purposes of evaluating reasonable treatment alternatives capable of <br /> reducing total inorganic nitrogen (TIN). It must present an alternative <br /> representing the greatest TIN reduction that is reasonably feasible on an annual <br /> basis. <br /> 3. In addition, the NRE must assess other site- specific main stream treatment plant <br /> upgrades, the applicability of side stream treatment opportunities, alternative <br /> effluent management options (e.g., disposal to ground, reclaimed water <br /> beneficial uses), the viability of satellite treatment, and other nutrient reduction <br /> opportunities that could achieve a final effluent concentration of 3 mg/L TIN (or <br /> equivalent load reduction) on seasonal average (April —October) basis. <br /> 4. The analysis must be sufficiently complete that an engineering report may be <br /> developed for the preferred AKART alternative as well as the preferred <br /> alternatives to reach 3 mg/L TIN seasonally, without substantial alterations of <br /> concept or basic considerations. The final report must contain appropriate <br /> requirements as described in the following guidance (or most recent version): <br /> a. The Criteria for Sewage Works Design (ECY Publication No. 98-37, 2019)6 <br /> b. Reclaimed Water Facilities Manual:The Purple Book (ECY Publication No. 15- <br /> 10-024, 2019)7 <br /> 5. The analysis conducted for the NRE must include the following elements: <br /> a. Wastewater Characterization <br /> i. Current flowrates and growth trends within the sewer service area. <br /> ii. Current influent and effluent quality. <br /> b. Treatment Technology Analysis <br /> 6 https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/summarypages/9837.html <br /> https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/SummaryPages/1510024.html <br /> Puget Sound Nutrient General Permit Page 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.