Laserfiche WebLink
GeoTest Services, Inc. Report Date 7/17/2019 <br /> Anderson Residence- Everett, Washington GTS Project No.19-0384 <br /> at the subject property. <br /> The western foundation wall of the existing residence is approximately 50 feet from <br /> the crest of the slope; the proposed addition will advance the residence footprint <br /> about 10 feet closer to the top of the slope for an overall setback of approximately 40 <br /> feet. Numerous other dwellings along the west side of Grand Avenue were observed <br /> to be about this same distance from the crest of the slope. The Snohomish County <br /> Online Property Information (SCOPI) portal indicates that the existing residence on <br /> the subject property was constructed in 1926, while nearby houses also situated close <br /> to the slope were built at least as early as 1905. Signs of large-scale earth movements' <br /> were not identified during site reconnaissance, historic aerial photography, or bare- <br /> earth LIDAR imagery from the Washington LIDAR portal. For these conditions, it is our <br /> opinion that the proposed 40-foot setback from the top of the slope is appropriate for <br /> the planned residential improvement, and no further landslide mitigation should be <br /> required. <br /> The proposed carport will extend west from habitable portions of the residence. <br /> Current plans suggest that the carport will be slightly over 10 horizontal feet from the <br /> existing retaining wall/top-of-slope area. Given that the carport is a lower use <br /> structure and that GTS anticipates relatively light structural loads from any posts or <br /> piers used to construct the carport, it is our opinion that a minimum 10-foot top-of- <br /> slope setback can be justified for this structure. Although the proposed carport is <br /> unlikely to have any significant impacts to the slope, reasonable mitigations can be <br /> incorporated into the construction of the carport to mitigate potential impacts. Items <br /> like deepened posts or piers to transfer structural loads deeper into the slope, not <br /> structurally connecting the carport to the residence, or providing shim spaces or <br /> threaded bolts that will allow re-leveling of critical carport elements should <br /> settlement occur would all be suitable mitigations to accompany the proposed 10- <br /> foot top-of-slope setback required to construct the carport. <br /> It should be noted that no amount of engineering can completely mitigate or prevent <br /> slope instability. The Pacific Northwest is seismically active and it is difficult to predict <br /> how the slope(s) at the subject site may behave during a large earthquake. GTS's <br /> review did not find evidence of historic, large scale slope failures on or below this <br /> project site. Although large scale failures are feasible,the more likely method of slope <br /> failure would be via small scale "skin"slides. Small scale landslides are typically failures <br /> of variable widths and shallow depths. Although these types of failures can be visually <br /> impressive, in most instances these failures only have limited impacts to the slope. <br /> Horizontal, top-of-slope setbacks and vegetation maintenance is commonly used to <br /> mitigate small scale landslide potential. Mitigation is intended to make the risk posed <br /> 4 <br />