Laserfiche WebLink
ill • <br /> tMatt and Team, <br /> 4 \ I apologize for the delay in responding to this inquiry. I have been working on a number of different <br /> ' I projects in the Port of Everett and I mistakenly thought I had provided a response to you much earlier. <br /> kN I have reviewed your parking layout and the deviations that you are requesting are completely <br /> reasonable and within my authority to approve. Accessible parking space dimensions are the only <br /> parking dimensions which may not be reduced,and only the minimum width requirements may not be <br /> reduced. It does not appear that you are requesting to reduce these widths so this shouldn't be an issue <br /> for you. For future reference,the unreducible width standard for accessible parking are 16'(parking <br /> stall+access aisle)for van accessible spaces and 13'for other accessible parking. <br /> {" 60 �� Once again,please accept my apology for the delay in providing feedback. In the future I will make <br /> every effort to keep track of questions on each development in the Port area separately to avoid this <br /> ao type of lapse. <br /> N,,,,, ..1 i <br /> Sincerely, <br /> 4At, Michael <br /> We are putting together our public works and land use submittals for the apartments at Waterfront <br /> Place Central,and there are a couple of potential variances from the parking dimensions that I'd like to <br /> discuss.I'm attaching a site plan for both parcels in our project for reference. <br /> 1. Drive aisle width—We would like to propose a consistent width of 24'(compared to a standard <br /> of 28',or 23'at compact stalls).This will reduce the amount of impervious area needed to <br /> provide the required parking,reduce the walking distance from parking spaces to the building <br /> entrance,and generally make the site more pedestrian-friendly.This request applies to both <br /> parcels. <br /> 2. Cross aisle width—We would like to propose a width of 21'-6"(compared to the standard of 24') <br /> in one location on the north parcel where the two-way drive aisle has no parking spaces <br /> accessed from it.This allows us to maintain a tree well in the middle of that row of parking <br /> spaces as well as a decent walkway next to the building.The raised pedestrian path across this <br /> area of the aisle will help to slow traffic down in this area. <br /> 3. Accessible parking space dimensions—We propose a stall length of 18'-6"for the van accessible <br /> spaces(compared to the standard of 20'),and a stall length of 16'(compared to the standard of <br /> 18'-6")for 25%of the total accessible spaces on the two parcels.This is related to our efforts to <br /> minimize the overall lot size and maintain pedestrian walkways through the site.In addition,we <br /> are proposing some smaller spaces to provide a variety of choices,and to keep the accessible <br /> parking as close as possible to the building entrance. <br /> Below are conditions we have previously discussed with you: <br /> 4. Canopy columns between parking spaces—you asked for information about the stall and aisle <br /> width which you will find on the attached plans. <br /> 5. Compact stalls—we propose to increase the number to 30%.I am attaching our traffic report <br /> that supports this percentage. <br /> 6. Wheel stops—per your email exchange with Mike Martin on May 17,we plan to eliminate <br /> wheel stops where it is possible to widen planting areas to accommodate the car overhang. <br /> Thanks for taking a look.Please let me know what comments or concerns you have. <br />