Laserfiche WebLink
29 <br />FY 2022 PSGP NOFO Back to the Top <br />• COTPs may require proposed projects to be socialized with the COTP/Area <br />Maritime Security Committee (AMSC) prior to applying. Applicants are <br />encouraged to coordinate with the COTP/AMSC routinely to ensure their <br />projects align with Port Area priorities. <br /> <br />3) Projects that are eligible and feasible, based on the available period of performance. <br />In addition, a recipient’s past performance demonstrating competent stewardship of <br />Federal funds may influence funding decisions. <br />• IJs should justify the scope, breadth, and cost of a project, as well as a timeline <br />for completing the project as required within this NOFO. Projects failing to <br />demonstrate these minimum funding considerations may be denied funding. The <br />following scale shall be used: <br />0=No Funding Recommended; 1=Funding Recommended <br /> <br />4) Projects submitted by a public sector applicant or projects otherwise certified by the <br />USCG COTP as having a port-wide benefit (please see the Preparedness Grants <br />Manual as well as the cost match section of this NOFO for further information <br />regarding what constitutes a port-wide benefit) will have their final scores increased <br />by a multiplier of 10%. <br /> <br />b. Financial Integrity Criteria <br />Prior to making a federal award, FEMA is required by 31 U.S.C. § 3354, as enacted by the <br />Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019, Pub. L. No. 116-117 (2020); 41 U.S.C. § 2313; <br />and 2 C.F.R. § 200.206 to review information available through any Office of Management <br />and Budget (OMB)-designated repositories of governmentwide eligibility qualification or <br />financial integrity information, including whether the applicant is suspended or debarred. <br />FEMA may also pose additional questions to the applicant to aid in conducting the pre-award <br />risk review. Therefore, application evaluation criteria may include the following risk-based <br />considerations of the applicant: <br /> <br />i. Financial stability; <br />ii. Quality of management systems and ability to meet management standards; <br />iii. History of performance in managing federal award; <br />iv. Reports and findings from audits; and <br />v. Ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements. <br /> <br />c. Supplemental Financial Integrity Criteria and Review <br />Prior to making a federal award where the anticipated total federal share will be greater than <br />the simplified acquisition threshold, currently $250,000: <br /> <br />i. FEMA is required to review and consider any information about the applicant, <br />including information on the applicant’s immediate and highest-level owner, <br />subsidiaries, and predecessors, if applicable, that is in the designated integrity <br />and performance system accessible through the System for Award <br />Management (SAM), which is currently the Federal Awardee Performance <br />and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS).