My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1311 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2022-06-29
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
1311
>
1311 W MUKILTEO BLVD 2022-06-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2022 9:27:35 AM
Creation date
6/29/2022 9:27:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
1311
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evalual NGA File No.1295621 <br /> Tsang Slope Restoration October 21,2021 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 3 18 <br /> Explorations: The subsurface conditions within the site were explored on September 8, 2021 by <br /> monitoring the excavation of one test pit and three hand auger explorations within the disturbed portion <br /> of the property to depths ranging between 4.0 and 12.5 feet below the existing ground surface. The <br /> approximate locations of our explorations are shown on the Schematic Site Plan in Figure 2. A geologist <br /> from NGA was present during the explorations,examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered, <br /> obtained samples of the different soil types, and maintained logs of the explorations. <br /> The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, <br /> presented in Figure 4. The logs of our borings are attached to this report and are presented as Figure 5. <br /> We present a brief summary of the interpreted subsurface soil stratigraphy in the following section. For <br /> a detailed description of the subsurface conditions,the specific exploration logs should be reviewed. <br /> 1. Undocumented Fill:At the surface of each exploration we encountered brown to dark brown <br /> silty sand with varying amounts of organics, debris, and gravel in a loose to medium dense <br /> condition,which we interpreted as undocumented fill. The fill soils adjacent and behind the block <br /> retaining wall extended to depths of 7.0 feet below the existing ground surface, while hand tool <br /> explorations above and below the cut rockeries encountered fill to depths in the range of 1.5 to <br /> 4.5 feet below the existing ground surface. <br /> 2.Glacial Advance Outwash:Underlying fill soils in all explorations we encountered fine to coarse <br /> sand with silt and varying amounts of gravel to the depths explored. The deposits were <br /> encountered in a medium dense to dense condition,and we interpreted them to be native glacial <br /> advance outwash soils. <br /> Test Pit One terminated in the advance outwash soils at a depth of 12.5 feet below the existing ground <br /> surface. Hand Augers One through Three terminated in the advance outwash soils at depths of 4.0,4.0, <br /> and 5.0 feet, respectively. <br /> Hydrogeologic Conditions <br /> Groundwater seepage was not encountered in our explorations. If groundwater is encountered during <br /> restoration, we would interpret this as perched water. Perched water occurs when surface water <br /> infiltrates through less dense,more permeable soils and accumulates on top of relatively low permeability <br /> materials. Perched water does not represent a regional groundwater "table" within the upper soil <br /> horizons. Perched water tends to vary spatially and is dependent upon the amount of rainfall. We would <br /> expect the amount of perched groundwater to fluctuate seasonally, if present. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.