My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3610 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
3610
>
Geotech Report
>
3610 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 2:07:08 PM
Creation date
7/20/2022 3:45:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
3610
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No. 1129119 <br /> Zahler Residence Development October 14,2019 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 3 <br /> The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, <br /> presented in Figure 4. The logs of our test pits are attached to this report and are presented as Figures 5 <br /> and 6. We present a brief summary of the subsurface conditions in the following paragraphs. For a <br /> detailed description of the subsurface conditions,the logs of the test pits should be reviewed. <br /> At the surface of Infiltration Pit 1 and Test Pits 1 through 5 we generally encountered approximately 2.0 <br /> to 2.6 feet of dark to light brown, silty sand with varying amounts of roots, organics, gravel,and debris in <br /> a loose to medium dense condition, which we interpreted as undocumented fill soils: Underlying the <br /> undocumented fill soils we typically encountered gray to gray-brown, silty fine sand with varying <br /> amounts of silt, gravel, and iron-oxide staining in a medium dense or better condition, which we <br /> interpreted as competent native glacial deposits. Infiltration Pit 1 and Test Pits 1 through 5 terminated at <br /> respective depths of 4.0,6.0, 8.0,7.0,9.0, and 7.0 feet below the existing ground surface. <br /> Hydrogeologic Conditions <br /> We did not encounter groundwater within our explorations. If groundwater is encountered during <br /> construction we would interpret the water to perched groundwater. Perched water occurs when surface <br /> water infiltrates through less dense, more permeable soils and accumulates on top of relatively low <br /> permeability materials. The more permeable soils consist of the topsoil/weathered soils and <br /> undocumented fill. The low permeability soil consists of relatively silty glacial soils. Perched water does <br /> not represent a regional groundwater "table" within the upper soil horizons. Perched water tends to vary <br /> spatially and is dependent upon the amount of rainfall. We would expect the amount of perched <br /> , groundwater to decrease during drier times of the year and increase during wetter periods. <br /> SENSITIVE AREA EVALUATION <br /> Seismic Hazard <br /> We reviewed the 2018 International Building Code (IBC) for seismic site classification for this project. <br /> Since competent transitional bed soils are inferred to underlie the site at depth, the site conditions best <br /> fit the IBC description for Site Class D. <br /> Table 1 below provides seismic design parameters for the site that are in conformance with the 2018 <br /> IBC, which_specifies 'a design earthquake having a 2% probability of occurrence in 50 years (return <br /> interval of 2,475 years),and the 2008 USGS seismic hazard maps. <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.