My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3500 TERMINAL AVE Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
TERMINAL AVE
>
3500
>
Geotech Report
>
3500 TERMINAL AVE Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 2:11:00 PM
Creation date
8/25/2022 11:06:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
TERMINAL AVE
Street Number
3500
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Port of Everett—South Terminal Wharf& Electrical Upgrades— Phase 2 17 <br /> hazard levels were obtained from the United States Geologic Survey(USGS 2008)for the site location,for a <br /> V530of 2,500 feet/second, representing an equivalent bedrock site.These response spectra, presented in <br /> Appendix D were used as input to our ground response analyses and two-dimensional analyses, and <br /> should not be used as a ground surface response spectrum for structural design. <br /> Table 3 — Summary of Considered Hazard Levels <br /> Return Percent Probability Time <br /> Period Interval <br /> of Exceedance <br /> (years) (years) <br /> 72 50 50 <br /> 94 40 50 <br /> 144 30 50 <br /> 224 20 50 <br /> 475 10 50 <br /> 2,475a 2 50 <br /> a. The 2,475-year hazard level was used as a basis for the Design Earthquake(DE)evaluation. <br /> Site-Specific Response Spectra <br /> Because of the existence of potentially liquefiable soils at the Port of Everett site, a site-specific ground <br /> response analysis is required for the wharf structure.The site response analyses were performed on two <br /> representative profiles. Profile 1 was developed to represent a profile extending from the top of the <br /> construction dike to below ESU 7, and featured no potentially liquefied soils. Profile 1 was analyzed using a <br /> total stress analysis, in which excess pore pressures are assumed not to develop in the soil. Profile 2 <br /> represents an offshore profile underlain by relatively thick deposits of liquefiable native sands and silts. In <br /> addition to a total stress analysis, Profile 2 was analyzed using the effective stress framework, in which the <br /> effects of cyclic pore pressure generation on the stiffness and damping properties of the soil are accounted <br /> for.Two platforms, DEEPSOIL(Hashash et al. 2016) and FLAC(Cundall, 1986),were used to perform the <br /> non-linear response analyses in the time domain.The procedures used to develop a site-specific response <br /> spectrum for the site is described in Appendix D. <br /> Analysis Results and Recommended Site-Specific Spectra <br /> The results of the site-response analyses and recommended spectra are shown on Figure 10 and <br /> summarized in Tables 4 through 9. For the 72-year, 94-year, 144-year, and 224-year hazard levels,the <br /> results are below the 80%code-based spectrum, and thus the recommended spectra are controlled by <br /> their corresponding 80%code-based spectra entirely. For the DE 475-year hazard level,the total stress <br /> analysis results for Profile 1 and the effective stress analysis results in FLAC for Profile 2 exceed the 80% <br /> code-based spectrum between approximately 0.10 and 0.50 seconds, which is reflected in the <br /> recommended spectrum. <br /> mf <br /> 4, 19232-01 <br /> HARTCROWSLR December 6,2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.