Laserfiche WebLink
biosolids are owned by farmer, is he required to <br /> pay prevailing wage to haul? If other entities buy <br /> the surplus,what compliance requirements apply <br /> to them and us? <br /> Not sure I understand this one. <br /> 5. R P for leased farm site to Possible lowest cost showing greatest Benefits of an RFP?What downsides might there be <br /> include hauling and land competition. Possibly we get no takers, as to following this process? <br /> application. City still runs D&D this is an unusual lease. Farmer then <br /> contract&coordinates with responsible for biosolids from pad—>field. I understand this one to be the same thing as <br /> Farmer. option one except that it includes an RFP process. <br /> This is probably a good idea.The main downside I <br /> would see would be extra time. The key in this <br /> would be to write the RFP so that you have a way <br /> of ranking proposals. <br /> 6. Agreement with PUD to provide PUD prefers to have a no-cost agreement. Can we sign an ILA or amend Jackson power project <br /> biosolids for land reclamation @ Less volume for farmers; less cost for City. to include biosolids? How long should this <br /> Jackson Power Project and share agreement last?OK to land apply and use PUD <br /> the cost. property? We do not want to amend the Jackson <br /> power project ILA.That is a hornets nest. If we take <br /> this route,we should just do a separate standalone <br /> agreement with the PUD. <br /> 7. ity applies 'osolids to rtions Additio I GLAP d SSLAP neede to ne, but ho will Ecolog ermit plicatio in <br /> of e TL-RO at need a ly. Ne to till c ss B un r to pr vent the a sites? <br /> vege tion. pub'c conta in high affic ar s. Not or <br /> lawns r reside tial. \ \, <br /> Scott Neon doe not see a benefit. <br /> S:\RBailey\Projects\Biosolids\Land Application Sites\Biosolids disposal options—PUD, ROW,farm.docx <br />