Laserfiche WebLink
e e <br /> element to help evaluate soil capacity for water quality treatment. The CEC tests and organic <br /> content tests were performed by AMTest Laboratories. A summary of the test results is provided <br /> in Table 2. <br /> Tablet. CEC and Organic Content Analytical Results Summary' <br /> Sample Organic <br /> CEC <br /> Exploration Depth Soil Type Content • <br /> (meq per 100 grams) (percent) <br /> • (feet BGS) <br /> Silty Sand with 8.9 2.8 <br /> TP-5 2.0 gravel T- Fill <br /> 1. Suitability for Water Quality Treatment: CEC greater than 5 meq per 100 grams and organic content a minimum of <br /> 1.0 percent(DOE,2012) <br /> The full analytical laboratory test report of the CEC and organic content test results is presented <br /> in Appendix B. <br /> 7.0 DESIGN <br /> Based on our review of the proposed preliminary development plans and the results of our <br /> explorations and analyses, it is our opinion that the proposed development can be constructed at <br /> the site. Our recommendations are provided in the following sections. <br /> 7.1 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA <br /> 7.1.1 IBC Parameters <br /> Based on our explorations and analysis,the following design parameters can be applied if the <br /> structures are designed using the applicable provisions-of the 2015 IBC. The parameters in <br /> Table 2 should be used to compute seismic base shear forces (IBC, 2015). <br /> Table 2. IBC Seismic Design Parameters • <br /> Parameter Short Period 1 Second <br /> MCE Spectral Acceleration S,= 1.422 g S, =0.540 g <br /> • • Site Class • D <br /> • <br /> Site Coefficient Fa= 1.0 FF= 1.5 <br /> Adjusted Spectral Acceleration SMs 1.422 g SM, =0.810 g <br /> Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters Sc,s=0.948 g So, =0.540 g <br /> G EO DESIGN= 4 NWHome-1-01:101618 <br />