Laserfiche WebLink
September 24, 2018 <br /> HWA Project No. 2015-061-21 <br /> potentially liquefiable soils along geologic profiles A-A' through D-D' are presented on <br /> Figures 5A through 5D, respectively. <br /> 4.2.3 Post-Liquefaction Residual Shear Strength Analyses <br /> We assigned residual shear strengths for the potentially liquefiable soils using Idriss and <br /> Boulanger(2007) relationships. The residual shear strengths assigned are a function of the <br /> equivalent clean sand SPT value, (N i)6ocs,potential for void redistribution, and the initial <br /> effective overburden stress. We assumed the void redistribution effects could be significant, <br /> resulting in the most conservative (lowest) estimate of residual shear strength. The liquefiable <br /> zones were assigned different values of residual shear strength parameters based on average <br /> (NI)6ocs and effective overburden stress values. <br /> 4.2.4 Liquefaction-Induced Settlement <br /> Loose sand deposits tend to densify when they are subject to earthquake shaking. For saturated <br /> sand deposits, excess pore water pressure builds up during the earthquake excitation, leading to <br /> loss of strength or liquefaction. After the shaking stops, excess pore water pressures dissipate <br /> toward a zone where water pressure is lower, usually the ground surface. The dissipation is <br /> accompanied by a reconsolidation of the loose sand (Ishihara and Yoshimine, 1992). The <br /> reconsolidation is manifested at the ground surface as vertical settlement, usually termed as <br /> liquefaction-induced settlement or seismic settlement. <br /> The potential for liquefaction-induced settlement was evaluated at the existing boring profiles <br /> within the 3-Acre Park project area. The methodologies used were developed by Yi and Andrus <br /> (2010), and are generally based on the relationship between shear wave velocity, cyclic stress <br /> ratio, corrected SPT blow counts, and volumetric strain. Using these methods, liquefaction- <br /> induced settlement along the project alignment was estimated to vary from 4 inches to 18 inches. <br /> We expect that the liquefaction-induced settlement will be differential in nature. Liquefaction <br /> induced settlement generally occurs after the earthquake shaking stops and the pore pressures <br /> dissipate. Therefore, any loads associated with liquefaction induced settlement should be <br /> decoupled from the inertial seismic evaluations. <br /> 4.2.5 Design Considerations Due to Liquefaction Susceptible Soils <br /> Our analyses indicate that the site is underlain by granular materials that are to varying degrees <br /> susceptible to liquefaction for the design event being considered. Liquefaction of the subsurface <br /> soils will impose additional loads to be applied to the crane foundations, as well as contribute to <br /> slope instability for most the river bank slopes on the site. Loads on the proposed foundations of <br /> the crane structure will include significant vertical downdrag loading as well as lateral loading <br /> caused by slope instability/lateral spreading. Liquefaction induced settlement is expected to <br /> affect the restroom structure and associated utilities. The restroom structure should be designed <br /> to accommodate liquefaction induced settlement while maintain life safety. <br /> Final Geotechnical Report-3-Acre Park.docx 9 HWA GeoSciences Inc. <br />