Laserfiche WebLink
September 24, 2018 <br /> HWA Project No. 2015-061-21 <br /> respect to a park development, where the consequences of river bank failure is considered to be <br /> much less significant to public safety. The figures also show that for a design level earthquake, <br /> bank failures (FS < 1.0) are likely to occur(see Figures 10, 13 and 15), for cross-sections A-A', <br /> Ic-c', and D-D'). We also presented the post-liquefaction case for the one cross-section A-A' <br /> (Figure 11), which indicates a very low value and would imply lateral spreading or flow failure <br /> would occur. Both cross-sections C-C' and D-D' have similarly very low factors of safety, <br /> reflecting the severe effects of subsurface soil liquefaction on bank stability. <br /> River Bank Seismic Slope Stability <br /> Our slope stability analyses indicate that failures of the river bank sections will occur under the <br /> influence of the design earthquake event. Two modes of failure may be anticipated, <br /> independently or concurrently; namely, slump failures induced by seismic ground accelerations <br /> and/or riverbank spreading due to liquefaction of alluvial soil. Observations of physical <br /> conditions of such failures indicate that the slump failures typically extend for limited distances <br /> behind the bank/slope crest; our analyses suggest of the order of 10 to 20 feet. Lateral spreading <br /> failures, however, have been observed to extend many tens of feet behind the bank/slope crest <br /> and can be physically accompanied by some flow failure deformation as well. To prevent such <br /> failure modes, it would be necessary to implement stabilization measures in the bank areas that <br /> would either retain the liquefiable soils (e.g.; retaining wall structures, or heavy buttressing with <br /> rip rap), or strengthen the soils (e.g. ground improvement with stone columns or deep dynamic <br /> compaction) so that they would be capable of resisting both failure modes. In consultation with <br /> the Shelter Holdings and the City of Everett, we have expressed our view and recommendation <br /> that, in consideration of the costs of implementation of such measures, it is far more cost <br /> effective to simply design for a level of stability that will be acceptable under normal static and <br /> low to moderate seismic conditions, and also accept the potential future costs of repair of the <br /> banks if a major earthquake causes damage. <br /> For bank stability analyses in the area of the crane structure, we assumed the existing sheet pile <br /> wall will be removed and replaced with a new sheet pile wall structure integrated with a new pile <br /> foundation system for the crane structure. <br /> 4.4 SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATIONS <br /> 4.4.1 Settlement Within the 3-Acre Project Site <br /> II I Grade increases are expected across the 3-Acre Park site as part of the proposed development. <br /> The loads associated with these grade increases and the proposed structures are expected to <br /> induce consolidation settlement of the underlying compressible soils. Further discussion <br /> associated with anticipated settlements is provided below. <br /> Settlement Mechanism <br /> All soils, whether cohesionless or cohesive, will experience settlements immediately after <br /> application of loads. Whether or not the settlements will continue with time after the application <br /> Final Geotechnical Report-3-Acre Park.docx 11 HWA GeoSciences Inc. <br />