Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Paul Korenovsky ES-6067 <br /> June 20, 2018 Page 9 <br /> Drainage <br /> Discrete zones of perched groundwater seepage should be anticipated in site excavations <br /> depending on the time of year grading operations take place, particularly within deeper <br /> excavations for utilities. Temporary measures to control surface water runoff and groundwater <br /> during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches and sumps. ESNW should be <br /> consulted during preliminary grading to identify areas of seepage and to provide <br /> recommendations to reduce the potential for instability related to seepage effects. <br /> Finish grades must be designed to direct surface water away from the new structures and/or <br /> slopes. Water must not be allowed to pond adjacent to the new structure and/or slopes. In our <br /> opinion, foundation drains should be installed along the building perimeter footings. A typical <br /> foundation drain detail is provided on Plate 4. <br /> Infiltration Evaluation <br /> As requested, we evaluated the capacity for infiltration into native soils in accordance with <br /> project development plans. Applicable requirements and procedures of the referenced 2014 <br /> SWMMVVW were incorporated into our evaluation. At this time, we understand the project will <br /> incorporate limited infiltration facilities (i.e. drywells, permeable pavement, rain gardens, etc.) <br /> into the design. <br /> ESNW conducted two small-scale pilot infiltration tests (PITs) within the proposed development <br /> area. The infiltration tests were conducted approximately four feet below the subgrade surface <br /> at TP-1 and approximately three feet below the subgrade surface at TP-2. The PITs were <br /> completed in general accordance with the 2014 SWMMWW test method described in Volume <br /> III, Chapter 3. Upon completion of the six-hour soaking period, measurements were collected <br /> at each PIT location. One test pit was advanced further to verify soil stratigraphy and to check <br /> for ponding and confining layer characteristics. <br /> The in-situ testing yielded measured infiltration rates of approximately 3.0 inches per hour (iph) <br /> at TP-1 and 1 iph at TP-3. Per the 2014 SWMMWW, correction factors must be applied to the <br /> measured infiltration rates and incorporated into the following equation: <br /> Design Infiltration Rate = Measured Infiltration Rate x CFv x CFT x CFM. <br /> • Short-term Infiltration Rate (Measured) —TP-1 3.0 iph <br /> • Short-term Infiltration Rate (Measured) —TP-3 1.0 iph <br /> • Site Variability CFv= 0.7 <br /> • Test Method (Small PIT) CFT= 0.5 <br /> • Degree of Influent Control CFnn = 0.9 <br /> Earth Solutions NW,LLC <br />