My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
423 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2023-05-31
>
Address Records
>
ROCKEFELLER AVE
>
423
>
423 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2023-05-31
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2023 11:21:21 AM
Creation date
5/31/2023 11:19:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ROCKEFELLER AVE
Street Number
423
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> CORRECTION RESPONSE LETTER <br /> Job Address: 423 Rockefeller(PLAN 3, 3542) <br /> Plan Check No: C2007-013 <br /> SEPT. 29, 2020 <br /> James Bronder, PE, SE Associate Engineer Plans Examiner ("..2,7 <br /> r b '�`<< `Lt1 <br /> 3200 Cedar Street, 2nd Floor, Everett, WA 98201 OCTD, <br /> 3 0 2020 <br /> CITY OF E vr. <br /> RE: Building Permit Correction Response Letter Permit Qy.�.;R�r- ' r <br /> • <br /> Dear Mr. Bronder, <br /> CORRECTION: <br /> 1. On Sheet A2.0, plan notes indicate a dwelling-garage separation for walls. However, it <br /> does not appear to contain notes for fire-resistive protection for the habitable spaces <br /> above the garage. Please verify and revise notes and plans as required. IRC Table <br /> R302.5. <br /> RESPONSE: On Sheet A2.0, plan note added to FLOOR PLAN NOTES "Dwelling/Garage Fire <br /> Separation 1. Garage shall be separated from the Residence and its attic by min. 1/2" <br /> GWB applied to the wall garage side and 5/8" TYPE X GWB applied to CEILING garage <br /> side. <br /> CORRECTION: <br /> 2. On Sheet A4.1, a glulam 5.125 x 15 or 6.75 x 13.5 is proposed to transfer both gravity <br /> and overturning forces from the 2 nd floor shearwalls. The permit calculations appear to <br /> show a gravity design load check, but does not appear to verify that the proposed glulam <br /> can withstand a combination of overturning forces in addition to the gravity load. Please <br /> verify that this beam and its supporting construction are adequate to carry the load <br /> combination with lateral load overstrength factors. Also, details to transfer the overturning <br /> forces from the shearwall into the glulam beam appear to be missing. Please clarify the <br /> transfer detailing for these conditions. ASCE 7-10 12.3.3.3, 12.4.3, IRC R106.1.1. <br /> RESPONSE: Per Structural Engineer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.