Laserfiche WebLink
Geminus Boeing Project Contract No.EVE-16-2929 <br /> Technology Development CEI Project No. 160731 <br /> decorative paint. Other paint mixes were not tested because they were all included <br /> in the Run 3 parameters. <br /> o Note: The "b" designation for this simulation was to reflect modifications <br /> to the initial exhaust distribution, following evaluation of the overspray <br /> clouds from initial simulations that included an earlier exhaust distribution <br /> (Case 2, Scenario 1). <br /> The previous 45-03 CFD Case 2 Analyses [2] consisted of a few other scenarios that were not <br /> performed for the 45-04 since the building geometry, air supplies/exhausts, and fan systems are <br /> very similar. These consisted of: <br /> • Fuselage only paint mode @ 75% airflow: This was not included since the lack <br /> of engine painting did not modify the over-spray clouds on the fuselage and <br /> vertical stabilizer <br /> • Power failure during paint mode at 75% airflow: The 45-03 analyses concluded <br /> that the paint guns would turn off very quickly after a power outage (within 5 <br /> seconds) while the air supply and exhaust fans would continue to provide air for <br /> up to 4 minutes after power loss due to their momentum (a linear spin down rate <br /> was recorded during spin-down tests). Time accurate 45-03 CFD analyses <br /> showed that at no point was there any additional build-up of over-spray in the 45- <br /> 03 paint hangar since the supply/exhaust fans were at —98% of their pre-power <br /> outage airflows when the paint guns turned off, thus not affecting any of the <br /> airflow in the hangar. i.e., the characteristic time scale to circulate the airflow and <br /> locally dilute the overspray during the paint gun turn-off delay were very much <br /> smaller than the timescale for the airflow to significantly reduce during the supply <br /> and exhaust fans spin down. The 45-04 has a similar air supply system. <br /> Boeing has specified four scenarios of interest for Case 3 analysis: <br /> • Case 3, Scenario lb (C3/S1b): 777x aircraft with the Run 3 spray gun <br /> conditions being applied to the fuselage, mid-wing top, and mid-horizontal <br /> stabilizer top, ventilation in 75% air flow mode (75% flow rate of Paint Mode). <br /> • Case 3, Scenario 2b (C3/S2b): 777x aircraft with the Run 3 spray gun <br /> conditions being applied to the fuselage, wing tip top, and mid-horizontal <br /> stabilizer top, ventilation in 75% air flow mode (75% flow rate of Paint Mode). <br /> • Case 3, Scenario 3b (C3/S3b): 777x aircraft with the Run 3 spray gun <br /> conditions being applied to the fuselage, mid-wing bottom, and mid-horizontal <br /> stabilizer bottom, ventilation in 75% air flow mode (75% flow rate of Paint <br /> Mode). <br /> • Case 3, Scenario 4b (C3/S4b): 777x aircraft with the Run 3 spray gun <br /> conditions being applied to the fuselage, wing tip bottom, and mid-horizontal <br /> stabilizer bottom, ventilation in 75% air flow mode (75% flow rate of Paint <br /> Mode). <br /> 7 <br />