Laserfiche WebLink
• The plans will be modified and configured to whatever format is requested with <br />whatever details are requested to satisfy the City of Everett Permit Services AHJ intake <br />standards. <br />Such AHJ-specific standards vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and I am flexible in <br />making these changes to conform to the City of Everett Permit Services AHJ <br />requirements. <br />2. The scope of the proposed project is not clear. The documents have been provided in <br />two or more submittals with uncoordinated and overlapping information. The drawings <br />include color coded information that appears to include both demolition and new <br />construction information on the existing and new plans. Annotated photographs have <br />been submitted in lieu of clear construction details. Construction -level drawings <br />prepared using established drafting standards are required to substantiate compliance <br />with the IRC. The drawings should include plans, building sections, details, material <br />specifications, design loads, architectural and structural notes, etc. as needed to clearly <br />show the proposed work. The current editions of the building codes applicable to the <br />project should be specified. See IRC Section R106.1.1. <br />The whole project is somewhat unclear. <br />A member of the City of Everett Permit Services asked the homeowner for a plan <br />showing how the home was configured prior to the un-permitted work being done. <br />There is no way to be 100% accurate with that task. The current layout of the structure <br />has been captured and a plan created. Additionally, a 3D Matterport walk through was <br />created to provide addition information of the current structure. Finally, plans were <br />developed to address the conditions that were not in compliance with the IRC. <br />NOTICE: IT CAN NOT be known with 100% certainty, how the current structure was <br />configured prior to the un-permitted renovations. Therefore, any information <br />presented about the structure, prior to the un-permitted work, should be considered as <br />a "best guess". <br />Under no circumstances should anyone believe that the pre-existing condition plans are <br />completely factual. The pre-existing plans were compiled by reviewing comments from <br />the homeowner, physical exploration of the home, and archived images from the <br />homeowner. The pre-existing plans are only a best guess estimate of wall removals and <br />new wall placement on the main floor level only. There does not appear to be any <br />structural alteration work done in the basement. <br />The home is pre-existing and only the parts that appear to have been affected are <br />referenced in the plan. <br />