My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R.L. Alia Company 10/17/2023
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
>
R.L. Alia Company 10/17/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2023 10:29:29 AM
Creation date
10/17/2023 9:12:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
R.L. Alia Company
Approval Date
10/17/2023
Council Approval Date
10/4/2023
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Erik Emerson
Subject / Project Title
Beverly Lake Water Quality Retrofit
Tracking Number
0003987
Total Compensation
$1,175,015.00
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Contract Subtype
Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
Imported from EPIC
No
Document Relationships
R.L. Alia Company 10/30/2023
(Attachment)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract\Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
R.L. Alia Company 10/30/2023 (2)
(Attachment)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract\Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
497
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EVERETT SPECIAL PROVISIONS <br />Beverly Lake Water Quality Retrofit Division 1 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS August 2023 <br />WO No – UP3745 SP – 67 <br />to make determinations of the acceptability of the Work. The City also has the authority to <br />accept or reject the City’s Representative's recommendations regarding retention of defective <br />Work. <br />1-05.1(2) Requests for Information (RFI) <br />No Claim shall be allowed because of ambiguities in the Contract if: <br />1. The Contractor discovers an ambiguity but fails to notify the City, or <br />2. The Contractor failed to discover a patent ambiguity that would be discovered by a <br />reasonably prudent Contractor. <br />If the Contractor discovers an ambiguity in the Contract or desires an explanation or <br />interpretation of the Contract, the Contractor shall request the explanation or interpretation <br />in writing by way of a Request for Information (RFI). The RFI shall clearly define the <br />ambiguity and have enough detail for the Engineer to provide an explanation or interpretation. <br />If such detail is not provided, the Engineer will return the RFI as incomplete. Should the RFI <br />require a change to the Contract, the Contractor will indicate in the RFI that it includes a <br />request for change (RFC). <br />A RFI shall not be used nor constitute a notice required in accordance with Sections 1-04.5 <br />and 1-04.7. The Contractor may submit an RFI for the one of following reasons: <br />1. The Contractor believes there is information missing from the Contract Documents <br />(Missing Information). <br />2. The Contractor believes a clarification of one or more of the Contract requirements is <br />necessary (Clarification). <br />3. The Contractor needs to repair or otherwise correct a deficiency in the Work that <br />requires a Change to the Contract to be acceptable (RFC – Construction Deficiency/ <br />Repair procedure). Requests submitted for this reason shall be submitted in <br />accordance with Section 1-05.7(1). <br />4. The Contractor needs to substitute a material that provides an equal or better level of <br />performance as the one specified in the Contract (RFC – Material Substitution). <br />Requests shall indicate the location(s), quantity, and shall describe how the material <br />provides an equal or better level of performance as the material originally specified. <br />5. The Contractor may submit a RFI that requests a change to the Contract requirements <br />for a reason other than one listed in items 1-4 of this section (RFC – Other). To be <br />considered, the request must not meet the requirements of a Value Engineering <br />Change Proposal. To be considered, the request shall describe how the change is <br />beneficial to the project <br /> <br />Unless otherwise determined by the City in writing, the Engineer will respond, in writing, to <br />RFIs within 14 calendar days in the order they are received. If the Engineer cannot respond <br />within 14 calendar days due to the nature and complexity of the RFI, the Engineer will <br />respond to the RFI stating how many additional days are needed for a full response. This <br />does not relieve the Contractor of its responsibility to request a time extension in accordance <br />with Section 1-08.8. If the Contractor needs to prioritize a RFI it shall indicate so as part of <br />the RFI. Oral explanations, interpretations, or instructions given by anyone other than the <br />Engineer will not be binding on the Contracting Agency. A response to a RFI shall be <br />considered a Written Determination. <br />If the Contractor’s Request for Information requires a change order, the Engineer’s response <br />will indicate whether they are authorizing the Contractor to proceed with the changed work <br />prior to an executed change order. Without this authorization, the Contractor shall not <br />proceed with the changed work until a Change Order has been processed. If the Contractor
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.