My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9909 2ND AVE W 2018-08-01
>
Address Records
>
2ND AVE W
>
9909
>
9909 2ND AVE W 2018-08-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 1:48:11 PM
Creation date
5/31/2016 11:31:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
2ND AVE W
Street Number
9909
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 1'3,2006 <br /> Project No. T-G001 <br /> 4.3 Seismic <br /> Review of City of Everett Ordinance No. 2909-06, Section 8, as well as City of Everett Liquefaction (Seismic) <br /> Hazard— Critical Areas Map 4 and Liquefaction Susceptibility Map of Snohomish County, Washington (Stephen <br /> P. Palmer et al, September 2004) indicate the site does not lie within a mapped seismic/liquefaction hazard area. <br /> Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in <br /> water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction main:y affects geologicallly recent deposits of loose, fine- <br /> grained sands that are below the groundwater table. Due to the relatively high shear strength exhibited by the till- <br /> like soils, the risk of soil liquefaction, soil failure, or settlements occurring at the site as a result of ground <br /> shaking during an earthquake is negligible. <br /> 2003 IBC Seismic Soil Site Class <br /> Based on the results of our investigation and the local geology, the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) <br /> indicates that Soil Site Class"C"should be used in structural design. <br /> 5.0 DISCUSSION AND PRELIMINARY RECOM 4'IENDATIONS <br /> 5.1 General <br /> Based on our study, in our opinion, there are no geotechnical constraints that would preclude development, as <br /> planned. The structures can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on competent native soils or <br /> on structural fill placed above these native soils. Floor slabs and pavements can be similarly supported. <br /> Organic soils were found to depths ranging from six inches to three feet (Test Pit ). Due to the loose, organic <br /> nature of these soils, they will be unsuitable for support of structures and pavements. In building and paved <br /> areas, the organic soils will need to be removed to expose native bearing soil subgrades and replaced with <br /> compacted structural fill. <br /> Some of the near-surface silty sands and silts at the site contain a sufficient amount of fines (silt-and clay-sized <br /> particles) that will make them difficult to compact as structural fill when too wet. Accordingly, the ability to use <br /> the soils from site excavations as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather <br /> conditions at the time of construction. If grading activities will take place during the winter season, the owner <br /> si ouid be prepared to import free-draining granular material for use as structural 511 and backfill. <br /> Detailed recommendations regarding these issues and other geotechnical design considerations are provided in <br /> the following sections of this report. These recommendations should be incorporated into the final design <br /> drawings and construction specifications. <br /> Page No. 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.