Laserfiche WebLink
The comments below were generated from this project's City of Everett Stormwater Reviewers. All questions shall be routed through this project's Public <br />Works Reviewer. <br /># <br />Document <br />Sht/Pg <br />Reviewer's Comment <br />Designer's Response <br />Initials <br />Review Comments from DEPARTMENT NAME: _Surface Water Management , REVIEWER NAME: Erik Emerson <br />1 <br />SSP <br />1.) The 2017 Hydrologic and Hydraulic report (HH Report) <br />1.) Noted. <br />CRW <br />documented the overall site facilities design, including the <br />core conveyance system. <br />2.) However, the HH Report did not fully address the <br />2.) Section 9 of the 2017 —WPC Hydraulic <br />determination of applicable standards or how all of the <br />and Hydrologic Report, lists specific <br />minimum requirements would be addressed. <br />compliance with the minimum <br />3.) Moreover, the City has adopted the 2019 Stormwater <br />requirements as presented in the 2014 <br />Management Manual while the HH Report was designed <br />manual. All requirements were <br />under the 2014 manual. <br />addressed with the exception of the MR <br />4.) Each new application must comply with the stormwater <br />2 — C-SWPPP which historically has <br />requirements in effect at the time of application. The <br />been provided by the contractor prior <br />stormwater site plan (SSP) for each new application must <br />to start of work. <br />include a determination of applicable requirements and a <br />summary of how each minimum requirement (MR) is <br />3.) Noted <br />addressed for the project. <br />5.) It's totally acceptable to reference back to the HH Report for <br />4.) Will add an updated compliance list to <br />the MR's that apply, but the documentation needs to be <br />the A17 —Supplement to the <br />provided in each new SSP. <br />Stormwater Report. It is our goal to <br />6.) to addition, most projects will require asite-specific backwater <br />develop a streamlined documentation <br />analysis for the onsite conveyance system design. Since this <br />process for review of individual parcels <br />project does not add any new conveyance the analysis is not <br />within the greater Stormwater "district" <br />needed. <br />of WPC which was presented in the <br />2017 report. So that the entire process <br />need not to be re -completed for each <br />smaller parcel. <br />5.) Noted, see comment 4 response. <br />6.) Noted <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />