My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1033 TEMPLE DR 2023-12-29
>
Address Records
>
TEMPLE DR
>
1033
>
1033 TEMPLE DR 2023-12-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2023 9:03:44 AM
Creation date
12/1/2023 11:03:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
TEMPLE DR
Street Number
1033
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 14, 2020 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Limited Geologic Evaluation <br />2. The setback buffer requirement shall be based upon information contained in a geological <br />assessment, and shall be measured on a horizontal plane from a vertical line established at the <br />edge of the geologically hazardous area limits (both from the top and toe of slope). In the event <br />that a specific setback buffer is not included in the recommendation of the geological assessment, <br />the setback buffer shall be based upon the standards contained in Chapter 19.18 of the <br />International Building Code (IBC), or as the IBC is updated and amended. <br />a. If the geological assessment recommends setback buffers that are less than the <br />standard buffers that would result from application of Chapter 19.18 of the IBC, the specific <br />rationale and basis for the reduced buffers shall be clearly articulated in the geological <br />assessment. <br />b. The city may require larger setback buffer widths under any of the following circumstances: <br />(1) The land is susceptible to severe erosion and erosion control measures will not effectively <br />prevent adverse impacts. <br />(2) The area has a severe risk of slope failure or downslope stormwater drainage impacts. <br />(3) The increased buffer is necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare based upon <br />findings and recommendations of the geological assessment. <br />3. Unless otherwise permitted as part of an approved alteration, the setback buffers required by <br />this subsection shall be maintained in native vegetation to provide additional soil stability <br />and erosion control. If the buffer area has been cleared, it shall be replanted with native <br />vegetation in conjunction with any proposed development activity. <br />In general, no specific buffer or setback is required based on the Me and location of the proposed <br />landscaping work. We recommend that any loose fill soils (stockpile) be fully used as structural <br />fill compacted behind new walls or removed as needed. All permanent cut slopes should have <br />inclinations of 2.SH:1V or less when completed. All areas should be surfaced with landscaping <br />materials and plants or new patio areas where proposed. <br />We recommend that any new surfaces placed near the top of slope systems be properly keyed into <br />medium dense or firmer native soils. These areas should not bear on loose native or fill soils at <br />the edge of a slope. Settlement could occur if this occurs. <br />C. Permitted Alterations. Unless associated with another critical area, the planning director, <br />using the review process described in EMC Title 15, Local Project Review Procedures, may <br />allow alteration of an area identified as a geologically hazardous area or <br />the setback buffers specified in the IBC if an approved geotechnical report demonstrates that: <br />1. The proposed development will not create a hazard to the subject property, surrounding <br />properties or rights -of -way, or erosion or sedimentation to off -site properties or bodies of water; <br />2. The proposal addresses the existing geological constraints of the site, including an assessment <br />of soils and hydrology; <br />3. The proposed method of construction will reduce erosion potential, landslide and seismic <br />hazard potential, and will improve or not adversely affect the stability of slopes; <br />4. The proposal uses construction techniques which minimize disruption of existing topography <br />and natural vegetation; <br />5. The proposal is consistent with the purposes and provisions of this chapter and mitigates any <br />permitted impacts to critical areas in the vicinity of the proposal; <br />www.cobaltgeo.com (2o6) 331-1097 <br />6ql <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.