Laserfiche WebLink
and April 2021 are significant in relation to MTCA compliance. Based on the evaluation presented in Section <br /> 6.2.1.2 and Figure 8,the January 2421 total arsenic exceedance at MW-6 is a statistical outlier.Given that <br /> arsenic is not a soil COC for the Site (see Section 6.2.1.1), arsenic in MW-6 groundwater is consistent with <br /> background levels when discounting the statistical outlier value, and dissolved arsenic concentrations are <br /> less than the arsenic cleanup level, a case is made that MW-6 groundwater complies with MTCA. <br /> 6.2.1.1.Background Arsenic in Soil <br /> There are no known potential sources of arsenic associated with the Site and soil sampling and chemical <br /> analysis completed as a part of the RI and soil cleanup indicate that arsenic concentrations in soil beneath <br /> the Site are consistent with natural background concentrations in the Snohomish Basin. Arsenic was not <br /> detected in seven of twelve soil samples collected at the Site from depths between 3 and 10 feet bgs, and <br /> the detected concentrations in the remaining five samples were less than the MTCA Method A cleanup level <br /> of 20 mg/kg (RI Table 2; GeoEngineers 2018a). The only possible non-background potential source of <br /> arsenic that is nearest to monitoring well MW-6 was the former sump that was removed during Site cleanup. <br /> However, concentrations of arsenic in the sample of residual product collected within the sump at time of <br /> removal and in five soil confirmation samples collected following sump removal, were all less than the <br /> MTCA Method A cleanup level. <br /> 6.2.1.2.Background Arsenic in Groundwater and MW-6 Statistical Evaluation for Outliners <br /> Total arsenic has been detected in groundwater samples obtained from monitoring wells MW4, MW-3, <br /> MW-5, and MW-6 during at least two of four groundwater monitoring events completed following soil <br /> cleanup, indicating arsenic is naturally occurring in the Site aquifer. The April 2021 arsenic concentration <br /> of 5.1 pg//L at MW-6 only slightly exceeds the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 5 pg/L and is significantly <br /> lower than the published background concentration for arsenic in the Snohomish Basin (11.8 pg/L). <br /> Ecology concluded in their draft publication that the current MTCA Method A cleanup level for arsenic in <br /> groundwater 5 pg/L is likely too low (Ecology 2021). <br /> Based on a statistical analysis of all arsenic groundwater data collected at the Site using EPA's ProUCL <br /> software, the January 2421 detection of arsenic at MW-6 is statistically a data outlier, suggesting an <br /> anomalous result(possible field or analytical causes). The results of the statistical analysis are presented <br /> graphically in Figure 8. <br /> 6.3. Request for NFA Determination <br /> The scope of groundwater compliance monitoring completed at the Site was approved by Ecology under <br /> VCP opinion letters. The results of groundwater compliance monitoring and the discussion above indicate <br /> the Site cleanup is protective of groundwater. On this basis, the City requests a No Further Action <br /> determination for the Site. Following receipt of a NFA determination the groundwater compliance <br /> monitoring wells will be decommissioned by a licensed well driller in accordance with WAC 173-160-381. <br /> 7.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> This report has been prepared for use by the City of Everett and their authorized agents.This report may be <br /> provided to regulatory agencies for review. No third parties should place legal reliance on this report. <br /> GeoEngineers has performed this work in accordance with the scope and limitations of our Agreement with <br /> the City of Everett dated October 5, 2016 and associated Contract Amendment No. 3 dated June 9, 2021. <br /> Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with <br /> GEOENGINEER� January24,2022 Page6 <br /> File No.0661-108-03 <br />