Laserfiche WebLink
of - C� e <br /> Yesterday 3:37 PM <br /> RE:WOODS COFFEE.62301-028,You've listed both fire sprinkler's and suppression are needed.however,Drew said he <br /> understands neither are required due to the size of the building.Can you confirm you agree with what Drew stated to ensure <br /> plans go out with correct permit requirements listed?THANKS <br /> Today <br /> e Kurtis Brown 7:53 AM <br /> Under the shell Permit they installed a fire alarm system,so if they make any modification to the system.they need a permit <br /> for the TI.They are correct there is no fire sprinklers in that side of the building.and they are not required due to the square <br /> footage and use. <br /> 8:24 AM <br /> Okay,so do I ignore the boxes you checked here on the review sheet and not worry about the red stamp Drew put on the <br /> plans indicating no FA or suppression is required?Just wanting to ensure nothing goes out the door incorrectly? Q <br /> "Tay%Mow <br /> 0 V•lif <br /> 0...la Pt nI wa4EIEE <br /> e Kurtis Brown 8:27 AM si 1 <br /> Yes,ignore the fire sprinkler comment and they need to be aware that the fire alarm needs a permit,if modified.This permit <br /> was weird because it was originally submitted as a shell building and later on split into two units.not knowing the occupancy <br /> use or occupancy load,and now that it has been submitted as a small be occupancy that section of the building no longer <br /> needs fire sprinklers.But the existing fire alarm system needs to be addressed if modified. <br /> 8:35AM <br /> Okay,thank you.Regarding"they need to be aware that the fire alarm needs a permit,if modified"that's not something a PT <br /> looks for prior approving and issuing a permit.Will ignore your"x's"and leave informing the applicant about future <br /> FA/suppression updates should they submit a TI.Please let me know if I've got anything wrong in my understanding of how to <br /> proceed with Woods Coffee.THANKS <br />